« Back to story "Breaking: SCOTUS stops Chrysler sale"

Story Comments

Posted by: nostalgia 6 months, 4 weeks ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

  • 86%
    nostalgia6 months, 4 weeks ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    They ignored 150 years of contract law and the Contract Clause in the Constitution:
    Article I, section 10, clause 1:
    “ No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility."

    Operative section: Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts

    This gives Ginsburg 24 hours to circulate the paperwork to the other justices and get a vote on whether to take the case
    She must be concerned herself or she wouldn't have issued the temporary stay

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply

    2 Replies

    loading loading ...
    • 100%
      pc256 months, 3 weeks ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      Chrysler has said a delay could scuttle the deal.
      FTA
      A federal appeals court in New York had earlier approved the sale, but gave opponents until 4 p.m. EDT Monday to try to get the Supreme Court to intervene.

      Ginsburg issued her order just before 4 p.m., when Chrysler would have been free to complete the sale of most of its assets to Fiat.

      She can ask the full court to decide whether to continue the stay or vacate it on her own, but if she was inclined towards the latter, she wouldn’t have issued the stay. And if Ginsburg has a problem with the government intervention here, just wait until Scalia and Thomas get a crack at it.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply

      1 Reply

      loading loading ...
      • 100%
        nostalgia6 months, 3 weeks ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        Have you read: Scalia Dissents?

        His opinions are memorable!

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        loading loading ...

    Post Reply

    You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.

    People Who Liked This Comment (6)

    People Who Didn't Like This Comment (1)