« Back to story "Obama cabinet secretaries to hit "auto communities""

Story Comments

Posted by: mesodude 6 months, 1 week ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

  • 50%
    mesodude6 months, 1 week ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It ยป

    Fox Nation headline claims "Stimulus Not Working," but link says "funds are not enough"
    May 12, 2009

    On May 12, FoxNation.com featured the headline "States Say Stimulus Not Working." But contrary to the headline's suggestion that states are claiming that the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 is not providing effective economic stimulus, the May 12 Washington Post article to which the headline linked reported: "Eleven weeks after Congress settled on a stimulus package that provided $135 billion to limit layoffs in state governments, many states are finding that the funds are not enough and are moving to lay off thousands of public employees" [emphasis added].

    The Post further reported that "[a]s the stimulus plan was being drawn up, there was agreement among the White House, congressional Democrats and many economists that a key goal was to keep states from making big layoffs at a time when 700,000 Americans were losing their jobs every month," and that the House-passed version of the bill included "$79 billion in 'stabilization' money to plug gaps in states' budgets," while "in the Senate, the stabilization funding was cut by $40 billion to secure the support of the three Republicans who were needed for a filibuster-proof 60 votes."

    http://mediamatters.org/research/200905120039

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply
    loading loading ...

    Post Reply

    You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.

    People Who Liked This Comment (3)

    People Who Didn't Like This Comment (3)