Evolution can occur in less than 10 years »

RSS Join the Discussion

Comments So Far: 16 (view all)

- Display No Filter Fair Comments - 25% and above Good Comments - 50% and above Excellent Comments - 75% and above

• JoseMadreComment removed: Hard Banned13 Replies

  • 100%

    smithichie4 months, 3 weeks ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    Heitable change though natural selection is the definition of evolution, which this case meets.
    
    Perhaps you are asking for an example of speciation?

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)

    Reply

    11 Replies

    loading ...
    • 100%

      CRYMTYPHON4 months, 3 weeks ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      It would be more cool if the 2 types of guppies
      changed enough that they could no longer have common offspring.
      I wonder how many generations that would take?
      
      Lions and tigers, horses and donkeys
      are just on the edge of being able to cross-breed.
      
      Bears and dogs share genetic ancestry but have become too distant.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)

      Reply

      10 Replies

      loading ...
  • 100%

    Tangent0014 months, 3 weeks ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    This is called 'moving the goalposts', and it's a logical fallacy. The distinction between 'micro' and 'macro' evolution is largely an artifice of the pro-creationism set. From a scientific point of view, the distinction is merely a matter of time. In other words, a series of micro-evolutions (adaptations within a species) will eventually lead to a macro-evolutionary speciation event. Indeed, 'adaptations' are not even necessary. On occasion, mere genetic drift acting on 2 isolated populations over an expanse of time will leave those populations no longer being able to interbreed. For more information, Wiki or Google the phenomenon of 'ring species'.
    
    Of course, when these examples are cited, the Creationist will automatically move the goalpost again with, "Well, it may be a different species of salamander, but it's still a salamander, right?" But then what would convince such a person of the validity of evolution? They want to be shown change in 'kind' (don't ask me for an exact definition of 'kind', even the Creationists don't have one). When it comes right down to it, they are asking to be shown a salamander changing into a frog in a single generation. Ironically, this would be better evidence for the influence of an intelligent agent than for evolution.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)

    Reply

    0 Replies

    loading ...
• 100%

  NoWayMan4 months, 3 weeks ago

  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

  in viruses, evolution happens even faster than 10 years.

  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)

  Reply

  0 Replies

  loading ...
• 100%

  Tangent0014 months, 3 weeks ago

  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

  Oh, hey! Look! Wolfie2007 dropped this article. Go figure!

  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)

  Reply

  0 Replies

  loading ...

View All 16 Comments

More News