« Back to story "Obama Opposes Plame-gate Release"

Story Comments

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

100%
Will13136 months ago

This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

Plame wasn't a spy...

-----------

really I guess that's why the CIA ask for an investigation.. just to divert attention away from torture....

and please tell us HOW the DNC was involved in outing a CIA agent...

you're simply becoming delusional the more you hate the wackier you become..

(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
Reply
1 Reply

loading ...
- 33%
  BB646 months ago
  
  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
  
  Actually, I think the CIA did use her as a cover story. For the last 40 years, the CIA has been less than successful in it's real mission, providing intel to the President. They missed a few things. Ever heard of the Korean War? How about the Berlin Wall both the building and the collapse? How about the fall of the USSR? Did you know they even missed the Iraqi attack on Iran? The Iraqi Invasion of Kuwait? They missed that too. My theory is simple. After 9-11, a lot of people were asking about disassembling the CIA. Most costly attack on the USA and the CIA missed most of it. Heads were going to roll. Dirty trick time. A typical CIA smoke screen that grew with the help of the former DNC appointed Clinton folks still at the CIA. By the way, I'm certainly not blaming Clinton for this. I'm blaming the CIA. Where is all of the money they blew for spying? The satellites, spy planes, secret agents, double agents? What were you folks doing for the last 20 years? You lied to Bush 41, Clinton and Bush 43 concerning the nuclear program in Iraq, what else have you been lying about or covering up? I think it's time for real change....
  
  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
  Reply
  0 Replies
  
  loading ...