« Back to story "The NYT/CBS poll is junk - and bad news for Obamacare"

Story Comments

Posted by: pc25 6 months ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

  • 61%
    pc256 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    FTA

    The number who would be willing to pay higher taxes to fund Obamacare (57%) is lower than in 1993. Of those willing to pay higher taxes, only 43% would be willing to pay as much as $500 a year more in taxes. That means fewer than 25% of a sample largely skewed towards liberals are willing to pay an amount far less than what Obamacare may actually require.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply

    7 Replies

    loading loading ...
    • 57%
      Klarissa6 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      Can't find the questions asked in this survey - suspicious.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply

      6 Replies

      loading loading ...
      • 78%
        Dionys6 months ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        Honey. Your not being able to find something isn't suspicious. It's par for the course.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply

        5 Replies

        loading loading ...
        • 42%
          nostalgia6 months ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          Don't debate the issue - just make personal attacks. Typical liberal

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
          Reply

          4 Replies

          loading loading ...
          • 100%
            DenCuddy6 months ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            Hot air dot com? Yes, the first line is correct, that is what propaganda looks like.

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
            Reply

            2 Replies

            loading loading ...
            • 33%
              nostalgia6 months ago

              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

              Did you even BOTHER to look at the NYT poll?

              Can you refute anything said in the article?

              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 7) (recursion depth : 6) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
              Reply

              1 Reply

              loading loading ...
              • 100%
                Tangent0016 months ago

                This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                Yes:

                "In this poll, the sample identified as 27% liberal, 37% moderate, and 29% conservative. In contrast, last week’s Gallup Poll showed Americans identify as 21% liberal, 35% moderate, and 40% conservative."

                The NYT poll did NOT segment by liberal, moderate, and conservative, they used people identifying as Democrat, Independent, and Republican. If you look at the Gallup poll, many Democrats identify as conservative, so the numbers are actually quite close.

                So Hot Air is lying about their 'analysis'. Go figure.

                (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 8) (recursion depth : 7) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                Reply
                loading loading ...
            • 50%
              Dionys6 months ago

              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

              "Don't debate the issue - just make personal attacks. Typical liberal"

              When someone consistantly lies, misstates the truth, twists the facts to say something they don't and then can't back them up with actual facts, as Klarissa is famous for doing, then it's not a personal attack, it's an attack on research methods.

              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
              Reply
              loading loading ...

      Post Reply

      You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.

      People Who Liked This Comment (14)

      People Who Didn't Like This Comment (9)