Story Comments
Posted by: metavirus 5 months, 2 weeks ago
This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.
-
86%
metavirus5 months, 2 weeks ago
-
90%
crespi5 months, 2 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Dan Rather made ONE factual error and was fired.
Reply
FoxNews's Brit Hume, Jon Gibson, Bill O'Reilly, Sean Hannity, Ducey and ALL THE REST of that bunch LIE EVERY DAY AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN since 1996(!!!) and have never even been punished in any way.
False comparison, Codi-girl.-
88%
metavirus5 months, 2 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
you ever notice how conservatives here on propeller ALWAYS jump to an attack on the other side when faced with an argument they can't refute on the merits?
Reply
e.g. "Governor Sanford had an affair and lied about it."
Results in "CLINTON CLINTON CLINTON EDWARDS CLINTON CLINTON!!!"-
88%
jakesguile5 months, 2 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Because it distracts us by forcing us to defend Clinton and Edwards in some way shape or form... What we need to do is just say, Distortion, and keep moving forward. Do not even address their lies, it gives them too much credence...
Reply
..although I admit I'm guilty of feeding them myself, it's fun to listen to them make fun of us like the little innane dissappearing species they are-
93%
metavirus5 months, 2 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
it's almost like they have a wingnut playbook that reads
Reply
"Rule 1: When faced with an argument you don't know how to refute on the merits, bring up the wrongdoing of Clinton or some other prominent Democrat."
as an aside, I am sure the golden rule is:
"When faced with no other option, blame the librul media" -
-
-
-
-
-
92%
jakesguile5 months, 2 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Really now... and I thought "libs kool-aid" meant thinking for yourself and not drinking f*cking kool-aid this whole time...
Reply
This makes me reevaluate everything I ever believed in! Up is down, black is white, Obama is Amabo, Communism is Capitalism. Bush is actually a genius!
And then this happened..
*shrugs*
-
-
40%
Nevron5 months, 2 weeks ago
-
-
82%
metavirus5 months, 2 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
since i won't post a 20-page comment on the lies of fox news throughout the ages, you should click through and read the article in question. the case involved a woman who worked for fox news who was refusing to go to press with a story that was being pushed by her superiors that she knew to be completely fabricated.
Reply-
33%
Nevron5 months, 2 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I did read the article. The station manager and anyone else involved in the cover up should be fired. What I was referring to was what Crespi stated...
Reply
"FoxNews's Brit Hume, Jon Gibson, Bill O'Reilly, Sean Hannity, Ducey and ALL THE REST of that bunch LIE EVERY DAY AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN since 1996(!!!) and have never even been punished in any way."
What did they lie about?-
metavirusComment removed: Spam
-
92%
Progressive5 months, 2 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
What did they lie about? I won't post a 20-page comment, either, but you can start with this link:
Reply
http://www.newshounds.us/-
-
-
0%
tanglang5 months, 2 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Why would I spend any more time on that ridiculous site (That shows the lies of Fox) when ten stories in it has not shown one lie?
Reply
The truth of the matter is that you guys hate FNC so much that you believe they lie even when you have no proof.-
-
0%
tanglang5 months, 2 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Since the first site that was supposed to show their lies turned out to be bunk you want me to try another? Get real. Especially when you are telling me to go check out a soros site.
Reply
A few weeks ago there was a story on here trashing Glenn Beck using a mediamatters video of part of Becks show. I saw that show. I watched it live. I pointed out where the soros site clearly edited the clip. Someone else on here even posted the link to the full Beck video unedited by lefties.
Now, having proved that the soros site media matters lied to make Fox look bad in the last month you still want to trust them when they say Fox lies to you??? You must be dummer than a bag of hammers.
-
-
-
-
-
-
100%
metavirus5 months, 2 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I never can understand what the propeller criteria for spam check is. i guess it must include posting links.
Reply
anyhoo, if you're interested in learning more about the lies they peddle, google using site:factcheck.org "fox news" or site:mediamatters.org "fox news". that should keep you busy for a week.-
Neutral
Nevron5 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I'm curious.....if all this information is available about how Fox news has consistently lied, why don't the other networks broadcast it to the public? I'm sure they would love to have any viable ammunition to put a competitor out of business.
Reply-
Neutral
jakesguile5 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Because it'd be considered unscrupulous.
Reply
And Fox News would bitch about persecution and make up a bunch of BS claims about how we were all lying about them. Essentially nobody wants to break the honor code not to rip on them, that or they just don't have the balls to run the articles. It'd just turn into a ****-throwing match anyway-
Neutral
Nevron5 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Unscrupulous to tell the public about a news outfit that blatanly lies? That doesn't make any sense. If anything this would increase the publics acceptance of a news outfit that was "looking out for them" by informing them of this. Also if Fox is going to "make up" lies the surest way to disprove them is with the truth. Why don't they expose them if they are telling the truth?
Reply -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Neutral
Nevron5 months, 1 week ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
A person asks when they do not have all the information on a given subject. It is how a person learns and obtains facts. What is "hopeless" is assuming someone should just "know" what you do....it is a cheap way of not providing evidence to back up your claim and demeaning to others, as well as showing your lack of understanding on the subject.
Reply
-
-
-
-
-
loading ...
Ciera-Marie
Ratskii
rumple4skin
jordan11
cleare
oneironaut420
deathray
alakazam
djn3nunez3
Beau7890
fsev41
Goppy
Will1313
Dionys
mesodude
crespi
DenCuddy
smithichie
bluetexasvalley
hefaa1
Progressive
Sageparadox
9critters
fiftynine
vidman04
tanglang
Codi6934
Post Reply
You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.