« Back to story "Court rules for white firefighters over promotions"

Story Comments

Posted by: Candida 5 months, 2 weeks ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

  • 100%
    Candida5 months, 2 weeks ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    Discriminating against white males is just as bad as discriminating against anybody else. When employers realize that minorities can't be promoted on the basis of a particular test, they should review whether the test is really job related and fair, and if the answer is yes, then those who scored highest should be promoted. If the answer is no, then they should set up fair selection criteria and re-run the competition.

    If minorities can't pass fair tests then there are many ways they can be helped without promoting them when they don't deserve it. They can be provided with study materials or the kinds of experiences that would help them learn in practice what they don't already know, so in the future they would be more competitive.

    I'm convinced that promoting minorities without expecting them to measure up to the same standards as others just hurts minorities. I think being promoted on the basis of gender, skin color, nationality, religion or other extraneous characteristics is demeaning to the person being promoted.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply

    2 Replies

    loading loading ...
    • 100%
      fiftynine5 months, 2 weeks ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      I agree totally with what you said.I also think those same standards should be adhered to when there are job cuts or demotions.
      We can't afford to dumb down this country any more than what it already has been.To not expect everyone to meet the same standards is hurting everyone.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply

      1 Reply

      loading loading ...
      • 100%
        vettenut5 months, 2 weeks ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        I absolutely agree with you as well, 59!

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        loading loading ...

    Post Reply

    You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.

    People Who Liked This Comment (1)

    People Who Didn't Like This Comment (0)

    No one voted this comment negatively.