Michael Jackson Death: Is Questioning his Personal Physician Dr.Murray Justifiable? »
Posted By WikiMap 4 months, 4 weeks ago in NewsDr. Conrad Murray, Michael Jackson's personal physician, was questioned by the Los Angeles Police for three hours on Saturday night (Pacific time) regarding Jackson's sudden death last week. Dr. Murray was alone with Jackson at the time of his cardiac arrest and resulting death. In fact, Dr. Murray was performing CPR on Jackson when the ambulance arrived at Jackson's home.
Read Full Story at mychannelnews.info »
1549 Views Share Story 13 Comments Report
Who Also Submitted:
RSS Join the Discussion
+ Add CommentComments So Far: 13 (view all)
-
67%
Cookiestar4 months, 4 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
IMO Michael Jacksons fits the profile of a pedophile to a perfect "T." He seduced the parents. He had well-developed techniques gaining access to children. He seduced his children victims. He had the ability to identify with & listen to children. He collected keepsakes from his victims. He has the classic symptoms of a pedophile which is refusing to say his behavior is wrong. In his mind sleeping with children that are not his own is fine. He has victimized multiple children. Using his celebrity to lure children into Neverland. Giving them alcohol. Taking them on rides. Showing them pornography. He was gaining their trust. I cannot see how anyone can possibly say that he was innocent of all the allegations against him after analyzing his behavior.
Reply
lets not forget that as we hold him up like some god. -
100%
reallypsst4 months, 4 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
And getting back to the topic,one discrepancy in the doctors answers to questions if michael was on multiple medications,i know every time i had to switch doctors there was blood tests and a series of extensive examinations besides transfers of medical records,and am just a regular mo, so a lot of back door bs is in play here and am pretty sure this doctor is in some trouble,how can you take over a case without covering your azz !
Reply -
-
100%
Aloofah4 months, 4 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Questioning any doctor is the right thing to do. First and foremost they are not gods and some aren't even good physicians. So, if you value your life, ask questions and even get a second opinion. Doing so the life you save my be your own.
Reply -
100%
Endoscopy4 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
The fact that he was there when Jackson died is reason enough to have to talk to the police. They will want to have everything the doctor did and prescribed for him prior to that day and what happened that day. Lots of questions. He will probably have to answer more questions as they look at what he told them this time.
Reply
There are too many similarities to Elvis. -
100%
Mutainia4 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
There are so many stories of this guy being circulated about that aren't true, I think they are going to have to have a special magazine called "Jacko" to cover them all. I mean, move over Elvis for when it comes to conspiracy stories. The latest story I heard, is that he became a Born Again Christian two weeks ago.
Reply -
Neutral
jordan114 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I haven't watched the news more than a 'blip' about Jackson's death. During that 'blip', doubts were being cast about the physician. Now I don't know if he did anything wrong or not, but I do know this; he will be 'perceived' to have done something shady by many people because of our rag journalism media, & the man will suffer over it the rest of his life. And that stinks.
Reply -
Neutral
tom1000334 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
All to often the first implulse is to blame the doctor. It seemes he certainly had made some mistakes, like trying to perform CPR on Jackson while he was lying on a bed. A basic Nurses Aide knows that the patient has to be on a firm surface for CPR to be effective. The bottom line is that Michael Jackson is the one to blame. He knew he was an addict and HE was the one who swallowed the pills and/or injected the drugs. Watch any interview with Jackson and you will see that he was a VERY disturbed man. His actions were of a classic pedophile and for people to worship him and scream accolades about what a great person he was.....think of all the children he hurt by his sick actions. I am sorry, but while the guy was very talented, he also was a very sick and sad man.
Reply -
-
-
Neutral
epiphannyy4 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Justifiable? He was the only witness to his death. Doctor or not, questioning him seems like simple procedure and common sense.
Reply
That being said, there is much about this doctor that raises questions:
~The fact that he's a cardiologist and Michael Jackson didn't have a heart condition makes me wonder why HE was the personal physician.
~The fact that this doctor claimed to have performed CPR on Michael Jackson prior to the EMT's arrival, yet he was "on the bed" when the 911 call was placed. Anyone who knows how to perform CPR realizes that you can't do it on a bed because the compressions won't work on a soft surface. You have to move the patient to a hard surface so the compressions actually compress the chest and pump the heart instead of just bouncing as the body sinks into the bed. Yet, the 911 call had the dispatcher having to instruct them to move him to the ground so CPR could be performed. Either this doctor is a quack and doesn't know how to perform CPR or he wasn't actually administering CPR before the call was placed.
~The fact that it took the doctor between 30-45 minutes to call 911 after finding Michael Jackson unresponsive and not breathing. Even if he was performing CPR that entire time, it is totally irresponsible for a doctor to forgo calling 911 and getting an unresponsive patient to a hospital and the defibrillator that he needed to save his life. What was he thinking?
Is it justifiable to question him? I think based on just the few questions that beg answers that seem obvious from someone on the outside of the investigation, I would say it's imperative. What real reason is there NOT to question him? -
Add a Comment
Sign In With Your Propeller Account
Please keep your comments relevant to this story.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.