« Back to story "The Best/Worst Argument Against Gay Marriage Ever"

Story Comments

Posted by: Charlson 5 months, 3 weeks ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

100%
Charlson5 months, 3 weeks ago

This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

The argument really comes down to this: women are for procreation while men are for pleasure. Which like most right wing nut theories of sex is wrong or in this case, half wrong. Women are also for pleasure and not only for procreation.

(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
Reply
4 Replies

loading ...
- 100%
  Progressive5 months, 3 weeks ago
  
  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
  
  It seems to me the general right wing nut theory is that homosexuality is unacceptable because sex is for procreation...though that doesn't explain why so many homophobes get caught committing adultery with either sex--maybe they don't think gay sex is counts?
  
  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
  Reply
  3 Replies
  
  loading ...
  - 100%
    metavirus5 months, 3 weeks ago
    
    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
    
    hey, you are at least able to knock up your mistress! so as long as a baby is possible, god loves you! /facepalm
    
    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply
    2 Replies
    
    loading ...
    - 100%
      Progressive5 months, 3 weeks ago
      
      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
      
      Well, I'm not able to knock anyone up, since I'm not a guy...but I get your point.
      
      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply
      1 Reply
      
      loading ...
      - 100%
        metavirus5 months, 3 weeks ago
        
        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
        
        sorry, meant that as a Royal You :)
        
        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 6) (recursion depth : 5) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        0 Replies
        
        loading ...