« Back to story "CANADIAN HEALTH CARE EXPLAINED"

Story Comments

Posted by: StevieGee 6 months ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

  • 100%
    StevieGee6 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    Due to the profitability (and the coinciding over prescribing) of MRI scans in the US, we have an abundance of the machines and technicians available. It's very possible that the waits here wouldn't be as much of a problem here as in Canada.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply

    2 Replies

    loading loading ...
    • Neutral
      chevydog6 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      You sort of touched on a question that i've been looking to get answered. Someone in an earlier discussion said that one of the reasons Canadian health care costs were so low was that there wasn't any need to employ people to reject you based on some criteria. So does anyone reject anyone? Obviously patients can say no to treatment. But does a doctor (e.g.) ever say in effect "Doing this particular stuff for you would be a waste of money and/or effort. So we won't"? If so, what criteria do they use?

      As I'm sure you know, private insurance companies in the US do this from time to time, for whatever reason. Sometimes a procedure is "too experimental"; sometimes (and this tends to incense people) it's merely for reasons of internal profitability. I know I was told once that if I were younger surgery would be OK - this was a strained MCL; but at my age they would do physical therapy instead. And I've had an MRI pushed on me whose need I wasn't sure of; and I've rejected surgery because I wasn't sure the doctor who wanted me to have it really got the whole story.

      Health care of any type isn't endless. So at some point a "no" has to be the answer to some things. If it's not for proitability or some other "crass" reason, it'll be a doctor (perhaps against my wishes) or even a bureaucrat.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply

      1 Reply

      loading loading ...
      • Neutral
        greenmac6 months ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        I have never known of anyone that has been denied treatment. The only rejection would be if the patients body would not accept any further efforts to save it.In the case of terminal cancer... a person may try to live their last days at home with the assistance of care givers and drugs, or they may go to the palliative care unit of the hospital

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply
        loading loading ...

    Post Reply

    You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.

    People Who Liked This Comment (2)

    People Who Didn't Like This Comment (0)

    No one voted this comment negatively.