Comments for Honduras under siege »

RSS Join the Discussion

Comments So Far: 3

- Display No Filter Fair Comments - 25% and above Good Comments - 50% and above Excellent Comments - 75% and above

• rovecannotdie6631Comment removed: Hard Banned2 Replies

  • 0%

    hyperbola5 months, 3 weeks ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    Guess you didn't watch the video. This "coup" has all the usual ear-markings of a US sponsored coup - despite the "protestations" of the Obama administration.
    
    The best that might be said for Obama is that maybe this is a repeat of the Cuban missile fiasco. Rogue elements in our military/CIA "encouraging" coups to try to force hard-line responses on a new president. If he has fallen into this trap, Obama should clean out the stables in our CIA and military thoroughly.
    
    If not, then it seems that Honduras is just one more place where Obama is continuing the failed military imperialism of the Bush administration that bankrupted the country, cancelled our constitutional rights and largely destroyed our democracy.
    
    The Significance Of Obama's Coup Attempt In Honduras
    
    http://www.propeller.com/story/2009/07/02/the-sign...
    
    There should be no doubts about the U.S.’ decisive role behind the now-crumbling military coup in Honduras. As commander and chief of the U.S. armed forces, the blame for this intervention lies solely on President Obama.
    
    The White House, however, would like you to believe that they “attempted to convince the Honduran military not to intervene.”
    
    Rubbish.
    
    When it comes to the Honduran military, the U.S. government needn’t ask permission for anything. The decades long relationship between the two institutions is one of dependence — Honduras’ military has long been financed and trained by the U.S....
    
    ... The reason for the coup lies in President Zelaya’s recent foreign policy shift — away from the United States towards Venezuela and the rest of Latin America. This turn was the result of the United States largely ignoring Honduras, after a long lasting, villainous relationship had ended: the U.S. had, for years, funneled large amounts of cash and arms to the Honduran government to kill the regions political leftists, the high point being the regions turbulent 1980’s.
    
    After Zelaya was elected in 2006 (he still has one year left in his term), he promised to shift Honduras’ politics toward helping the poorer layers. He realized that he could not achieve any of his promises with the scant amount of aide from the U.S. and looked instead to the Latin American trade association, ALBA. Zelaya explained:
    
    "I have been looking for projects from the World Bank, the Inter-American Development Bank, Europe and I have received very moderate offers ... that forces us to find other forms of financing like ALBA." ( Rueters, April 26,2008 )
    
    The U.S. government did not like this move, since it prefers U.S. banks to dominate the economies of Latin American countries.
    
    ...Obama himself does nothing to condemn the coup. Yes, he is “deeply concerned” about the events in Honduras, but his vague comments about “dialogue” and respecting “legal procedures” is full of loopholes — big enough for a coup to squeeze through.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)

    Reply

    1 Reply

    loading ...
    • Neutral

      hyperbola5 months, 3 weeks ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      If Obama immediately refused to recognize the newly installed coup government in Honduras, while threatening to withdraw U.S. military and financial aide — along with the U.S. ambassador — the coup would dissolve in seconds. Strong actions like these, however, were completely absent.
      
      ...the broader motive for the coup. The U.S. banks and other corporations that once dominated Latin America are being quickly pushed aside, so that governments may use their country’s wealth for social services and real economic development — not foreign for-profit plunder.
      
      The U.S. coup attempt in Honduras is thus a sign of desperation. It was also a huge gamble. Obama had hoped that the U.N. and OAS would let this one slide. It was also hoped that the Honduran people would be intimidated by martial law and a communications blackout. Neither was the case.
      
      Huge protests have defied the military-ordered curfew. Latin American countries have united in defiance of a tyrannical U.S. policy. It is reported that these happenings are causing splits in the Honduran military, while also a general strike was being prepared by the nation’s trade unions.
      
      In consequence, the coup is likely to crumble, and Obama’s first attempt to re-tame Latin America will have failed. The actions of the U.N. and OAS are striking examples of the shrinking international influence of the U.S., meaning that future interventions — both military and economic — are likely to be more direct to restore U.S. hegemony. Obama’s more-subtle attempts to uphold U.S. “influence” in the world will ultimately require blunter, Bush-like tactics.
      
      If the Honduran coup fails, Obama will eloquently discuss how pleased he is that “democracy was restored” — while refusing to admit that he tried to kill it.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)

      Reply

      0 Replies

      loading ...