« Back to story "Conspiracy fever: As rumours swell that the government staged London's 7/7 bombings, victims' relatives call for a proper inquiry | Mail Onli"

Comments for Conspiracy fever: As rumours swell that the government staged London's 7/7 bombings, victims' relatives call for a proper inquiry | Mail Onli »

Posted By gamahuche 5 months, 3 weeks ago in Political News

Families of the dead victims and an increasing number of 7/7 survivors claim there are inconsistencies and basic mistakes in the official accounts that need explanation.

Read Full Story at dailymail.co.uk »

RSS Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 15
- Display
  • 100%
    gamahuche5 months, 3 weeks ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    I'm not a big fan of conspiracy theories and the implications of this one are extraordinarily challenging but the special factor that none of the alleged perpetrators are found on any CCTV footage of the time really does defy belief. These cameras are EVERWHERE in Central London. And of course they are supposed to be there to make the city safer!

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
    Reply
    loading loading ...
    • 100%
      gamahuche5 months, 3 weeks ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      I used to love London and England and still have many friends there but choose never to go there these days because it doesn't any more feel like a land of freedom - and the culture went to hell during the Blair regime.
      Propeller member berkeley, who gave me this story, and I have both been concerned also by the shocking murder of Dr David Kelley and the "mistaken" police shooting of Charles de Menenez http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/police-... and the gruesome probable murder of Dr David Kelly in relation to the evidence on which Britain's involvement in Iraq was based - link below:

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
      Reply

      2 Replies

      loading loading ...
    • 100%
      berkeley5 months, 3 weeks ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      the official story of the 7/7 bombing is impossible in many of its details. while the british press continues its support of the government version, even this story can't help but wonder about several glaring lies/inconsistencies.

      if the truth ever emerges, heads will roll.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
      Reply

      5 Replies

      loading loading ...
      • 100%
        Natureboy5 months, 3 weeks ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        Well, it's got to be deja vu for Americans. The official story of the WTC attack is as improbable as it is convenient.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
        Reply

        4 Replies

        loading loading ...
        • 0%
          DaneL5 months, 3 weeks ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          And I'm sure you think Elvis has just left the building and JFK is living on some island. The tin foil hat crowd finds a new conspiracy.

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
          Reply

          1 Reply

          loading loading ...
          • 100%
            AnteUp5 months, 3 weeks ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            I wonder if you said the same thing when WE were questioning the

            - idea of imminent danger from Iraqi WMD's in 2003

            - government's spying on our domestic communications

            - rendition flights of anonymous people to foreign destinations
            for interrogation and MUCH worse

            - government's POLICY of using torture - sometimes even
            BEFORE interrogation - on various people in the Middle East,
            and the RIGHT to do the same to Americans deemed enemy combatants

            Tell the truth now - did you say the same thing? Or did you just call
            us traitors for posing those questions, which I might add, have ALL
            turned out to be very valid inquiries.

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
            Reply
            loading loading ...
          • 100%
            AnteUp5 months, 3 weeks ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            That the Neocons actually SAID our country needed another Pearl Harbor
            to get the country enthused about their agenda.......................and then PRESTO!
            A sneaky underhanded attack on civilians and those stupid Americans had
            absolutely NO idea it was coming.
            It's just all so perfect, isn't it? EVEN if it happened exactly as we were told -
            I will NEVER believe that it was unknown to some members of our government.
            I won't belabor it - but JUST like Pearl Harbor...................our government knew
            what was coming - when it would arrive and they CHOSE not to do anything
            about it except let it happen. They wanted the carnage and shock to use
            the outrage that would follow it to DRASTICALLY change our lifestyles and
            policies. And didn't it just work like a charm??

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
            Reply

            1 Reply

            loading loading ...
            • 100%
              AnteUp5 months, 3 weeks ago

              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

              Re: "A sneaky underhanded attack on civilians and those stupid Americans had
              absolutely NO idea it was coming. "
              I should have put a question mark after that statement. It is not what I believe to
              be the case............but the scenario, as I stated it, is so bogus - so unbelievable.
              Sounds like a B-movie plot..................and I do not believe we are that inept.
              Makes me want to shout, Hooray for Hollywood! I am NOT buying it.

              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
              Reply
              loading loading ...
        • 100%
          gamahuche5 months, 3 weeks ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          Also FTA:
          Many responsible people - and they include former Scotland Yard deputy assistant commissioner Brian Paddick, former anti-terror chief of London police Andy Hayman (who oversaw the police response to 7/7) and David Davis, until recently Tory Shadow Home Secretary - now support the call for an independent investigation into the bombings.

          Paddick himself said this week, the torrent of rumours about 7/7 was harming relations between Muslims and the rest of Britain: 'Hopefully there will be people in the police service, the security service and Whitehall who will realise how important it is that every attempt is made to counteract these conspiracy theories.'

          As the fourth anniversary of the London bombings approaches next Tuesday, they are words the Government would be wise to heed.

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
          Reply
          loading loading ...
          • 100%
            AnteUp5 months, 3 weeks ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            The survivor mentions TRUST............trust?
            Doesn't someone need a REASON to have trust?
            I don't - and I have plenty of reasons why.
            It isn't just that terrible sham about Dr.Kelley.
            What about the neat and tidy disposal of the anthrax
            sender? What Dr.Z visited the labs late at night even
            though he was no longer an employee? Only tinfoil hatted
            conspiracy lovers would mention such a thing - right?
            What about Sen. Paul Wellstone's death - "icing" - oh yeah!
            The same formula is being used globally - and I think
            even a truth commission is a waste. 9/11 - Warren Commission -
            the Flight 800 investigation..........I'm sorry, I am fresh
            out of trust. I think it is sad, scary and the only way to
            find a sense of happy calm in the 21st century is to savor
            the bliss of IGNORANCE.
            Thanks for the submittal though - it heartens me to know
            that there are others who are struggling with these issues.
            We'll have to wait and see how far the Brits get with their
            demand for full disclosure.

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
            Reply
            loading loading ...
            • 100%
              onlyonesecret5 months, 3 weeks ago

              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

              People who believe in the wonders of government, and that it is their friend, should think twice about it.

              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
              Reply
              loading loading ...
              • Neutral
                TheNewsseeker5 months, 3 weeks ago

                This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                This story sounds nearly unbelievable to me. Like after 9/11, the question rises, why the intelligence didn´t notice anything.
                How could it be that in London, the best-watched city of the world, the CCTV didn´t help to prevent such a catastrophy?
                Even if I don´t share the opinion that the assassination was faked to blame the Muslims and to create an islamophobic atmosphere, I wonder, why in both cases, warnings were ignored and proofs were destroyed.

                (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                Reply
                loading loading ...
                • Neutral
                  Jaydee405 months, 3 weeks ago

                  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                  In London as in New York the truth is almost to terrible to believe. The simple fact is even if the truth were to come out what can the public do about it? Clearly laws mean nothing to the people involved.

                  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 100000) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 100000)
                  Reply
                  loading loading ...

                  Add a Comment

                  Sign In With Your Propeller Account

                  Forgot your password?

                  Please keep your comments relevant to this story.

                  To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.