Story Comments
Posted by: b-happy 5 months, 2 weeks ago
This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.
-
67%
b-happy5 months, 2 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Whatever guy, you have a PRESIDENT named Clinton that had sex in the oval office and the Democrats defended that. Where was your outrage?
Reply
Right now I'm listening to Pelosi talk about Michael Jackson in a news conference. Are you F'ing kidding me? THis is the party you love? THe party that would rather talk about Michael Jackson than helping out the protesters in Iran? The party that also did nothing when BUsh was ruining the economy.
Hate to say it but the same peope the Bush is in bed with are also in bed with your buddies the Democrats. Get real guy. You have no clue.-
-
100%
vor5 months, 2 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
No one I know of or have heard of defended Clinton having sex with someone other than his wife in the White House or anywhere else. That is absolute bullsh-t. Now many did did say it was not a "impeachable" offense, that it was not a high crime or misdemeanor, big difference.
Reply
The point is Mark Sanford is not Bill Clinton. You are behaving like children as I said above. This is like saying Johnny threw a rock and broke a window so why can''t I? Clinton never held himself up as a paragon of virtue like Sanford. Nor did he desert his office for five days (the reason he should resign, not the affair) at anytime to be with his lover(s). Nor did he claim his was a love affair, while admitting to numerous liasons with other women. No one should be making excuses for either of these men's indiscretions. That is the point!
Your 2nd paragraph dissolves into the exact rhetoric I referred to. What exactly should (or could) the Democrats have done to stop Bush? The minority party is not responsible for the actions of the ruling party. The ruling party is the one that controls the veto. Period! Bush held total veto control for those 8 years, the Democrats never held any override capability. Go ahead and deny that fact! I don't recall Republicans saying there was anything wrong with his economic policies until the big lurch in Sept '08. . His "base" was quite well taken care of.
You have proved yourself a fool with your remarks. "No clue'? You simply are not dealing from a full deck. Playing with only jokers apparently.
-
loading ...
simonsez
fjgalt
MisterX
vor
CRYMTYPHON
Post Reply
You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.