Comments for Hate Mail From An "Inclusive" Liberal Socialist »
Posted By btatman22 5 months, 3 weeks ago in Political OpinionHere is a lovely piece of fan mail from an inclusive liberal named Theresa. We are not mentioning Theresa’s last name, out of respect for her freedom of speech, and we don’t want any reprisals against Theresa for sharing her views, as misguided as they are. This is the type of “free speech” that liberals really believe in. If anything, Theresa only solidifies the point behind our video entitled “Inside the Liberal Mind”. Without further ado, we present a liberal’s view on free speech.
Read Full Story at freshconservative.com »
RSS Join the Discussion
+ Add CommentComments So Far: 187
-
65%
rbiii5 months, 3 weeks ago
-
-
50%
not2needy5 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
That Theresa's name on Propeller was Tessylo! She's a woman who doesn't mind speaking her mind, and telling it like it is.. She's honest to a fault, and just because none of the neocons on Propeller could stand the truth, they whined until they got her banned. UNLIKE you cons, Libbies can't come back to Propeller when they are banned, they are banned for life.. Left leaning my ass!
Reply-
-
-
63%
lovemylibs5 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Which time? Can we count him only once or can we count him multiple times?
Reply
There would be plenty of others if liberals actually were banned from Propeller. Did you know that psychohosebeast was another member before he was banned as PHB?
-
-
-
-
-
-
100%
Beau78905 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I'm not defending the manner in which Theresa expressed herself.
Reply
That said, nowhere does she argue that you shouldn't be able to put your propaganda on YouTube or Propeller. Nowhere does she appear to want to limit free speech, as this blog post says. -
Neutral
jovial5 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
That was one so called "liberal socialist taking btatman to task". If you really want to see hate then check out this submission by scott4261.
Reply
http://www.propeller.com/story/2009/05/08/media-ma...
-
-
65%
tadair9195 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
the profound irony, of course, is that their failure to differentiate among different people is actually very similar to the root problem with bigotry and racism in the first place.
Reply
there are a few here that spew the same hate that they accuse others of. and i have a few ideas of who could have written this. -
-
100%
willottica5 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Well... I don't think guessing "Tessy" would be a stretch from "Theresa"... but does she have a current pseudonym? (Come on, speculation is fun!)
Reply
All I know is it can't be antibrainwasher, because there was no mention of "baby jesus on a jetski" or "gay jesus" or "caribu barbie". I don't believe it's possible for him to write anything without throwing in one of those terms (a side-effect of his brainwashing, I imagine).-
-
-
-
67%
dunkirk5 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
No it pretty much has the rant of Endo or Lubs in it. Meso tends to point out the fallacy of the logic of a lot of the right wing arguments which they seem to now be characterizing as hate speech or ranting. Usually once he does that righties like Endo and Lubs start with the "hate" speech claims and liberal this or that. All you need to do is read their posts to see that,
Reply
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
59%
Klarissa5 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Unfortunately there are many liberals who are filled with anger.
Reply
And, anger is frustration turned inward.
When their candidate, whom they helped elect, does not carry through on the promises that the liberal believed in, it is terribly frustrating.
And also, a very unpleasant mental state to think that the belief in the candidate might have been based on wishful thinking, not on real world situations.-
-
-
55%
mesodude5 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"Unfortunately there are many liberals who are filled with anger."
Reply
--I find it hilarious that only cons are allowed to be angry. Personally, I believe in being "armed and dangerous" without the need to run out and start blowing people's heads off just because an election didn't go my way. Note that unlike cons (who have been manufacturing every reason under the sun for their spectacular losses in recent elections), we had *legitimate* reason to contest the election in 2000. But did we flip out and have teabag parties? Did any Congressional Democrats take to the floor and advocate secession or suggest that constituents rush out to buy guns? Did any Democrats in Congress advise Americans to refuse to be counted in the Census? Did they do *any* of those things, Klarissa? Exactly...So don't even TRY to claim that those on the left are somehow less stable than white supremacist teabagging cons who love guns. DON'T TRY IT. ;-(
"And also, a very unpleasant mental state to think that the belief in the candidate might have been based on wishful thinking, not on real world situations."
--ROTFLMAO...Ok, thanks. I needed that, Klarissa. Good one. By the way, don't project. Cons got screwed inside and out by Bush and Cheney and you loved every second of it (and pleased DO go and BITCH to Propeller about that phrasing, Klarissa) and if anyone is angry it's you people. You've repeatedly backed losers who, even when in power don't fulfill ANY of the promises for which you're here every day prostituting your very neocon souls. And your party is split down the middle, too. Let's not pretend that you're in a postion to preach. You absolutely aren't. ;-x -
-
not2needyComment removed: Spam
-
-
-
-
-
67%
vor5 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"And also, a very unpleasant mental state to think that the belief in the candidate might have been based on wishful thinking, not on real world situations."
Reply
This from somebody who I believe would vote for Sarah Palin!
This real idiocy is that those with a brain are waiting to see the results of the stimulus. Not 6 months out but more like two years. You know, the minimum amount of time to really see how this thing is really working.
But the idea of returning back to the type of leadership that brought us this disaster is as-nine. I am not abit disillusioned with Obama. Very pleased with how he is dealing with the world. I only wonder what all of these naysayers are going to say when the economy inevitably turns around? This recession could last at least another year but the business cycle says eventually we will climb out of the trough. There is currently to much supply and not enough demand. At some point this will change. Those are the true factors that drive the economy.
-
-
67%
nostalgia5 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Theresa better watch her step
Reply
H. R. 1966
Megan Meier Cyberbullying Prevention Act
SEC. 3. CYBERBULLYING.
(a) In General- Chapter 41 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
`Sec. 881. Cyberbullying
`(a) Whoever transmits in interstate or foreign commerce any communication, with the intent to coerce, intimidate, harass, or cause substantial emotional distress to a person, using electronic means to support severe, repeated, and hostile behavior, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.
`(b) As used in this section--
`(1) the term `communication' means the electronic transmission, between or among points specified by the user, of information of the user's choosing, without change in the form or content of the information as sent and received; and
`(2) the term `electronic means' means any equipment dependent on electrical power to access an information service, including email, instant messaging, blogs, websites, telephones, and text messages.'.
(b) Clerical Amendment- The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 41 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new item:
`881. Cyberbullying.'.
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:H.R.196...
Big Brother may soon be watching-
92%
smithichie5 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
While I agree the mail is on the emotional side, (and for all we know, fictional side) I see no attempt to coerce, intimidate, harass or cause emotional distress. The mail didn't attempt to coerce btatman into stopping his blogs, nor intimidate him into stopping. For harassment, I would imagine a large number of such mailings would have to be received and as for the emotional distress, Btatman's reasoned response shows no evidence of being distressed.
Reply-
JerrySmithRulesComment removed: Hard Banned3 Replies
-
-
73%
Jaydee405 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"a) Whoever transmits in interstate or foreign commerce any communication, with the intent to coerce, intimidate, harass, or cause substantial emotional distress to a person, using electronic means to support severe, repeated, and hostile behavior, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both."
Reply
I guess Fox news and CNN along with every other new channel are breaking the law. When is their trial?
-
-
-
-
83%
sinophil495 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Wolfie - "I think Teresa proved the entire point of the video regrading the liberal mind."
Reply
Although the post from Theresa is completely obnoxious and inappropriate, I fail to see how it characterizes "the liberal mind."
How about the rabid Republican in one of McCain's campaign rallies that shouted out about shooting Obama and made McCain embarrassed. He tried to defuse the hatred he himself generated by saying that Obama was indeed a good American.
How about the secretiveness, paranoia, lying, exclusivity, bigotry, and persecution perpetrated by notable conservatives like Joe McCarthy, J Edgar Hoover, Spiro Agnew, Richard Nixon, George Wallace, Strom Thurmond, Jesse Helms, Tom DeLay, Dennis Hastert, David Dukes, Karl Rove, Dick Cheney, George W Bush?
What would you say about the "liberal mind" set of notables like Abraham Lincoln, Franklin Roosevelt, Earl Warren, Adlai Stevenson, Harry Truman, Hubert Humphrey, John Kennedy, Martin Luther King, Lyndon Johnson, Robert Kennedy, and even William Clinton.
Clinton was HATED by the conservatives, but he personally never espoused hatred nor tried to suppress his political opponents.
What's more, the philosophical foundation of our country is based on liberalism. The Mayflower pilgrims were escaping religious intolerance and persecution. We rebelled against the rule of King George. We are the international champions of women's rights and women's vote, protection from child labor, establishment of democracy, civil rights, racial equality and abolishment of slavery, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, minimum wage, social security, anti-monopoly laws, occupational safety, food safety, environmental safety, seat belt laws, smog laws, etc.
Every one of these ideas was considered too radical for its time or too damaging to the previous status quo or anti-business. Each of these ideas was fought against by the prevailing political, special interest, or business interests of the time.
Yet today we could not conceive of a society without all of these laws and protections in place. Even you conservatives. Liberalism is our entire way of life.
If you accept all these laws and ideas, YOU ARE A LIBERAL. -
67%
toph19735 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Well we know what yoyur mind is full of wolf. Racism, Bigotry and intolerance. All we need to know about your mental state is by your post. Painting all liberals like that is foolish. I wouldn't expect anything else from you though.
Reply
-
-
-
74%
david_nwpa5 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Most liberals do not espouse such hatred or dare I say, show it, unless provoked. It would not be beneath the cons on Propeller to push their free speech and their views down the throats of more moderate and liberal folks here. Seems to me this article, and the video that preceded it are little more than a way to garner votes for a pseudo-article. Nice try, btatman, but not too many libs are falling for your bait.
Reply-
56%
dunkirk5 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
This seems to be the latest tactic of the right. When someone criticizes what they say they claim its hate speech or ranting. They dont address any of the charges made and theresa does attack what was presented, please note the exact same thing they accuse theresa of doing is exhibited by the writer, he writes off her post as hate mail and doesnt bother to identify how she is wrong, its assumed she is wrong. THis seems to be highlighted best by Palin and her everyone is against me, The poor righties are in such a tizzy they dont bother to defend what they write they seem to be unable to do that.
Reply-
JerrySmithRulesComment removed: Hard Banned3 Replies
-
56%
amazed5 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
What part of "What a distorted, hateful, bigoted, racist, anti-American, anti-anyone not exactly like you and your braindead thug American haters. You are one nasty piece of sh*t - spreading your hatred and propaganda - against women - against minorities - against anyone who isn't exactly like you and your lockstepping braindead imbecilic medevil archaic hateful Nazi Ayran nation. I'm not against free speech but all you spread is hatred. I hate you and anyone who is just like you - any current so-called Republican - neocon - hate what you are doing to this country. The divisiveness - you and Karl Rove and people like you belong beneath hell - hell is not good enough for hateful bastards like you."
Reply
Please elaborate where this woman is addressing any issues. Also, when someone calls you a "nasty piece of sh*t", "braindud thug American hater", "I hate you and anyone who is just like you", "people like you belong beneath hell -- hell in not good enough for hateful bastards like you".
Yeah, wow, he really went out on a limb characterizing this hate speech...-
67%
dunkirk5 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Did you see what she was commenting on? Its your usual right wing hit piece lately of everyone is against me we are all going to hell in a handbag with no substance. Her comments pretty much addressed that. It WAS HATE SPEECH AND SHE CALLED IT LIKE IT WAS. Did she go over the top on it, sure she did but its what happens after listening to the bs from the right for so long. Maybe you can show me where in his response he addressed that NONE of what he posted was what she said?
Reply
-
-
-
-
JerrySmithRulesComment removed: Hard Banned3 Replies
-
-
96%
pokydoke5 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
There are wing nuts on both sides of the aisle. There are some very nasty conservatives who post here on propeller. I enjoy the spirited give and take for the most part and I don't even mind being called a few names now and then. I do not lie or try to mislead. I make every effort to try and justify my point of view and I do try and not get too nasty. I am not hate filled and I am not a wingnut. I am a progressive liberal, always have been and always will be and I will not apologize for my views.If you find that objectionable then you need to look no further than the mirror if you want to find someone who is against free speech.
Reply -
-
-
-
roosieComment removed: Hard Banned
-
KJeffVComment removed: Hard Banned
-
50%
mesodude5 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I don't get it. Is there supposed to be some kind of lesson in this? Why do you cons think you're any less hateful than anyone else? Because your hateful parents taught you that if you cloak your hateful right wing rhetoric in terms like "Democrat Congress" and "liberal socialist" that this makes you morally superior to people who express their hatred using four-letter words? You don't think your hatred for those different from you comes through loud and clear simply because you tell yourself that you're better (for not using profanity)? Well, all I can say to that is GMAFB.
Reply
--Cons, listen up...You're absolutely out of your minds in your grief over having lost in November and, ever since, you've been running around shooting people to death and publicly screwing around on your spouses with wild abandon. No one is fooled by your transparent attempts to shift the focus off of your elected officials' nutty,slvtty behavior and the crazy antics of unstable and violent teabaggers (yes, I said it--TEABAGGERS--get over yourselves). You're MURDERING people in museums and churches, conjobs, and now you're here sobbing in pain because the big bad liberals don't play by *your* rules? Get serious, cons.-
JerrySmithRulesComment removed: Hard Banned9 Replies
-
-
-
-
69%
NoWayMan5 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
well, yeah. that was one nasty letter. angry. over the top. mean.
Reply
its like listening to a segment, any segment, of the rush limbaugh show, which you cons pay him to do.
so don't go crying foul when a lib gets nasty. nasty is the cons' game. has been for quite awhile now. you have people on the radio doing it. you even have an entire TV channel devoted to misinformation, dirty tricks and lies all dressed up as if its news.
there's a reason why the GOP has a department of dirty tricks and people like Karl Rove in its ranks.
so sack up and quit your crying.
but whats hilarous is the repsponse of Brett Tatman, editor of frechconservative.com (btatman22 on propeller, whose obviously pushing his own blog).
His reply?
"Just to clear up your accusation of me being a hater, etc., I am not. I simply tell people the truth."
now THATS funny.
btatman, do you actually believe that nonsense? you simply tell people the truth?
wow.
thats denial wrapped up in delusion.
I'll take someone whose nasty and angry and being honest about it over a bullsh*tter whose simply delusional any day. -
JerrySmithRulesComment removed: Hard Banned28 Replies
-
48%
not2needy5 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I got an email from Tessylo and she asked me to let you all know that email was indeed from her. At least she doesn't do what she does in stealth! She's honest, and for her honesty she was banned, unlike you dishonest, whiny, crazy loon wingnuts who have the morals of a gutter snipe and wallow in a cesspool of dog doo and lies!
Reply-
-
62%
not2needy5 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I hate the way Propeller allows you all to do the mean spirited deceitful things you all do, post the hate fill blog op-eds you post without consequence, call liberals every name imaginable and continuously come back after being banned without banning you again, but patrol religiously to insure that no banned Liberal can ever come back.
Reply
You all have run off Bkumm, 1basque1, Shadowolf, BeeBoppin, texangelwings, and that's just for starters.. The ones you haven't ran off, you have whined about until you get them banned..
Yea you all have had a ball with this, but you never saw the hatred in the op-eds that have been posted from Brett Tatman's personal blog, freshconservatives! Oh Yeah! Liberals are feeling the love from that puke palace!-
-
50%
not2needy5 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Don't dish it out, if you can't take it.. It's not my nature to call people names but when i see monikers like, DanmLiberals, Libsrfunny, Lamdiberals, etc etc, it doesn't make me want to be very friendly to you all. Then it's --silly libs, liberal liars, and a host of other negative comments that just doesn't endear me to cons either! lol
Reply-
67%
icono15 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Truly sensitive aren't you.
Reply
However, I think you need to follow your own advice.....
"Don't dish it out, if you can't take it.. ",
to make sure you don't wind up in these very offensive and insensitive situations were only liberals are made fun of.
Maybe you need to stay on those threads that only rag out the Cons.
However I do love it when you really flame us 'Cons' but scream foul when someone flames you and your beloved Libs back.
Like I said.....
you go girl.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
78%
slate5 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Wow Needy,,,,,,,,,, that was more than a bit nasty,,,,, of course you think it's different since you did it.
Reply
(I hate the way Propeller allows you all to do the mean spirited deceitful things you all do, post the hate fill blog op-eds you post without consequence, call liberals every name imaginable and continuously come back after being banned without banning you again, but patrol religiously to insure that no banned Liberal can ever come back.)
Have you read any Palin Threads of late? Do you hate that sort of thing as well?
Have you seen any name calling on the left? Nahh you only see from one side. You see one side as hate and the other as truth.
Maybe the right just gets a leg up because we are a minority here and have minority rights here?-
55%
not2needy5 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
WE didn't write those Palin pieces or post our own opinion pieces as fact slate, that's the difference in what most of the Liberals on Propeller does to what this new wave of neocons do. They post from their personal blogs and most of it is posted under NEWS! As though their opinions are fact.
Reply
If i turned every hate message i have gotten as a member here into a thread, i would do nothing day and night but post threads based on personal hate messages. However, we're not supposed to think anything of this man posting this, and the outpouring of supporters he got, while many of you secretly post hate messages to our profile pages, or site mail. lol
The right gets a leg up here because Propeller is owned by AOL, and it's a known fact that AOL is owned by a bunch of cons! That's not news!
You all are a piece of work!-
75%
slate5 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
So you think this guy exposing your 'friend' is more egregious than the content of your friends hate filed message to him?
Reply
Yeah I'm a piece of work but you are a tapestry made up of a million pieces,,,,, GAWD Though if I recall i have replied to unsolicited hate mail from others I don't recall sending any unsolicited hate mail to anyone on this site.
I'd love to see any hate mail I've sent to you needy,,,,, feel free to post it/them.-
50%
not2needy5 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I didn't say you slate, just like you have never received hate mail from me, there are some of us on both sides who don't do that. I'm just saying that if everyone who received hate mail turned it into a thread, that's about all Propeller would have on it, and you know i'm telling the truth!
Reply
Personally, i don't know a liberal who does or did that, but i'm not going to say it didn't happen. I know lots of liberals who have gotten a lot of hate mail on here though.. I wasn't looking for a fight, just stating a fact. -
-
-
-
-
-
62%
icono15 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Well n2n, if so, good for tessy.
Reply
I miss her observations, for the following is absolutely wonderful; fta
"The divisiveness - you and Karl Rove and people like you belong beneath hell - hell is not good enough for hateful bastards like you."
I have to assume that hell, if it exists, is according to the poster, only inhabited by non-divisive 'loving bastards'. If so, then that would mean that the Devil is definitely mellowing out in this day and age of secular enlightenment and liberal permissiveness.
(Maybe he, the Devil, went to anger management classes and has turned a corner in his search for a 'kinder and gentler' Prince of Darkness.)-
-
60%
icono15 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Well needy, from what I said above, it would appear that hell is a wonderful place for non-divisive loving bastards of which, of course, I am not. So apparently, even if I believed in hell, it would not be a place for me. Maybe heaven, if it exists, is now open to divisive hateful bastards only, which is good for me; for I would hate to think that when I die that I would go to a place where all of my friends and many of my favorite liberal bloggers such as yourself, tessy, and others would be absent. It would ruin that whole 'happiness thingie' that heaven is advertised to be.
Reply
-
-
-
-
-
83%
CRYMTYPHON5 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I will remember it!
Reply
And I will remind you.
But since I take Ratskii's conclusion that the idiot's of either party do
not define the party,
- I will be arguing that the next example of con ranting is not
a tarnish on all conservatives,
- while you will be insisting it is.
Wow. This consistency stuff is hard..-
75%
lovemylibs5 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Consistency is easy when you have multiple ingredients making up your slurry. You see, when there are obviously people that post using more than one entity on Propeller, consistency is just a new sign-on away. That way the good cop can always remain good.
Reply
The bad cop is still there, just in an assumed role.-
50%
CRYMTYPHON5 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Talking in 2 or 20 voices does not increase the power of a single word said;
Reply
or escape the requirement to be honest.
Sock- puppets are useless noise.
They make no point, add to no argument,
and decide no issue.
Anyone using them is weaker for it.
And if lovemylibs declares here,
that any chosen idiot expresses the worth of a party,
- then lovemylibs will have to stick to that in the
lib version of the debate,
- even if 50 sock puppets say otherwise.-
75%
lovemylibs5 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Feigned support is the power gained. Feigned honesty has no requirements, just the proper person pushing a certain stance as the honest one, while using the other hand to type words that conclude the opposite.
Reply
And lovemylibs (sorry, don't know the html to link and color my name) is simply saying here that the subject of this story has issues. And that there are Propellerites on both sides with the same issues who use the same tactics. What in my posts have led you to imply something different?
Also, since you are advocating a singular voice of honesty, do you write for politicususa.com under the name of Jason?-
100%
CRYMTYPHON5 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
That is my point.
Reply
I don't write under any name except Crymtyphon
because if it was good writing why would I want it under another name?
The obvious sock-puppets are weak idiot voices;
they provide no support anyone sane would want.
about blue letters :
The blue letters come from HTML tags.
Do this.
Type <a-> at the start of what you want in blue; and </a> at the end of what you want in blue.
<b>But </b> notice I put a dash after the <a ?
Leave that out. I put that in so the system would
not turn my text blue and disapear.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
100%
jakesguile5 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
There's actually a Dumbocrat party? I thought that was just a joke... Is there also a Disney Snakes For the Enslavement of Humanity Through Hypnosis party as well? How about a Princess party?
Reply
SURELY there's a party founded upon Jim Crow if there's one founded upon Dumbo!-
83%
CRYMTYPHON5 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I joined DSFEHT.
Reply
They made me wear a Cinderella costume and sell flowers at the
airport.
I looked pretty good but it made me sweat and the flowers wilted.
Eventualy I ran away and became a democrat.
I think 'dumbocrats' have something to do with elephants or poor spelling but it could be a filler for 'can't think of anything insulting' .
-
-
-
50%
icono15 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Well have to go now and talk to some of my Dimocrat friends for they are truly pizzed about the negative and angry talk of a Porkulus2 bill or the sequel to Stumbulus1, Stumbulus2, coming form some elements of the 'liberal inside' and of course those average tax paying citizens that elects the 'liberal insiders' to office.
Reply
I think it is time to have a 'tea party' for them....don't cha' know. -
-
86%
CRYMTYPHON5 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I want to thank Pc25,
Reply
for taking this courageous stand against hatred in politics.
It will be hard for him;
his own side will smile as he condemns the left;
- but they will turn on him like surprised beasts when he applies his moral authority to them .
He will be called traitor;
He will be called hypocrite;
He will stand alone against both sides;
unless we help him in this crusade .
Let everyone here solemnly vow that we will aid Pc25
in ending hate rants.
Pc25 will be our leader restoring dignity, truth,
and worth to the content of political discussion.
And after the battle, the blood,
the pain and the shouting and the trumpets
- a new day.-
86%
CRYMTYPHON5 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
We the propeller people,
Reply
who propped this piece,
promise the premise
to preserve the peace;
- or forevermore wear the label of troll .
biglarry
simonsez
Klarissa
vidman04
dBergeron
slate
kent13304
nostalgia
icono1
zaph22
DaneL
onlyonesecret
jmopinion
Grisson
jimdoze
lovemylibs
gbudavid
Wolfie2007
Gwhiddon
tadair919
FairNBalanced
k9kssr
Pecossam
punx jcjdentinc
natelowry9
galaxy9800
juslen
btatman22
No surrender,
no compromise;
we allow no insults,
justify no hate-rants,
tolerate no personal reference.
Honor and truth will be our guides
in the words we speak,
in the silence we keep.
You can sign too:
-
-
50%
CRYMTYPHON5 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Ouch!
Reply
We libs are only against hate mail if it is against liberals?
Why sign our names to a rule we would never endorse?
Hate rants are wrong, - from left or right.
All justifications for them are hypocrisy.
I am sure I did not misunderstand you.
You propped this post;
In the kindest interpretation, it is a sermon against hate.
Those who dropped it, interpreted less kindly.
You stand against hate rants, whether from the left or right;
and we libs stand with you!
And your moral strength will lead you to win that fight.
Go, Klarissa! -
-
-
Neutral
CRYMTYPHON5 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Never pretend we think it is.
Reply
Truth is fire;
it is what we have, that the honest animals do not.
And since we value truth;
don't lie and pretend that has anything to do with hate rants .
This article is a hate piece, pretending to be against hate pieces.
Take your interpretation seriously, - and be against hate rants.
Or burn yourself in the fire.
-
-
-
-
-
-
100%
frctm55 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Anyone can selectively find offensive or inflammatory rhetoric by people of any political persuasion. Now are you going to claim that people on the right don't use such language or write equally offensive letters? This letter proves nothing and if you are making the claim that all liberals are like this, than that just means you aren't very objective or a very good critical thinker. Timothy McVeigh was right wing and was the biggest domestic terrorist before 9/11. Therefore this must be typical of the right wing mind that they want to blow up government buildings. This is the same level of logic employed in this post. Keep the laughs coming.
Reply -
67%
Justice4All5 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
That was quite a rant that Theresa went on. But I have seen much worse from some Neocon's.
Reply
But to take her rant and portray her as a typical liberal is a complete lie. No different than taking the rants of some of the supremicists here and portraying them as typical conservatives.
This story is much more interesting to anyone who has seen the video "Inside the liberal mind". Suddenly Theresa doesn't seem so out of line. -
83%
Klarissa5 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Quote:
Reply
"I'm sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and disagree with this administration, somehow you're not patriotic. We need to stand up and say we're Americans, and we have the right to debate and disagree with any administration."
- Hillary Rodham Clinton -
33%
bonaroo5 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
btatman22
Reply
Posting this comment reveals as much about your personality as is does Teresa's. Using a single example of someone losing their temper (especially after being bated) to describe all Liberals is a weak arguement. When I was in elementary school we would call people like you "tattle tale". -
67%
ranchhasawhiteass5 months, 3 weeks ago
-
0%
CRYMTYPHON5 months, 3 weeks ago
-
25%
CRYMTYPHON5 months, 3 weeks ago
-
33%
CRYMTYPHON5 months, 3 weeks ago
-
67%
ranchhasawhiteass5 months, 3 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
You sure are a dumb ass Crymtyphon. Looks I am the "ONLY ONE" who has said anything kind about Tessy on here. Besides Not2needy.Get your head out of your ars . Hate speech my dying ass. I did like her whether you believe that or not. Now you, thats another story .
Reply
-
-
-
-
loading ...
Add a Comment
Sign In With Your Propeller Account
Please keep your comments relevant to this story.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.