Story Comments
Posted by: Ratskii 5 months ago
This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.
-

Ratskii5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Hate to say this, Wiki, but I think that stats are a bit off. The author of the article could improve his English too. There is no way that 80% of Americans had TB in the 1990s. I don't trust the 1/3 of population world wide quote either.
Reply
Don't mistake me. TB is a huge killer and some strains have become immune to most of the wonder drugs. But try to post more reputable sources.
Here's a better source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuberculosis-

fempatriot5 months ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I think that was a typo and should have read in the 1890s. I know of several families that had the disease back in the early 1900s, and it killed most of them. I once asked a neighbor why so many in her family had died during a particular year (I thought it might have been a flu epidemic) but she said they all had TB. And one of my great uncles married a woman who came from a family with TB. they had around 10 children and lost about 4 of them to TB.
Reply -

WikiMap4 months, 4 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
1/3 of of world population infected with TB. Source supporting this data
Reply
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/07/opinion/07kristo...
its not a mistake.
-
People Who Liked This Comment (0)
No one voted this comment positively. Is it really that bad of a comment?
People Who Didn't Like This Comment (0)
No one voted this comment negatively.
Submit a Story
Advertisement

loading ...
Post Reply
You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.