The Man Who Knew Cheney's Secret - Page 1 - The Daily Beast »

Posted By AnteUp 4 months, 2 weeks ago in News

1 of 1

The New Yorker's Seymour Hersh was mocked in March when he referred to Dick Cheney's secret squad of CIA assassins. Now, he talks to The Daily Beast about the next shoe to drop.

Read Full Story at thedailybeast.com »

389 Views Share Story 29 Comments Report

Submitted By:
AnteUp

Never shy about putting in my two-cent's worth.
A local reporter was scouring the neighborhood for the local's opinion
on an issue. I ...

Other Related Articles:

RSS Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 29 (view all)
- Display
  • 100%
    deathray4 months, 2 weeks ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    if sy hersh is to be believed, and he's usually a credible source, i suspect that the inevitable will happen, and a congressional investigation will convene.

    mr. cheney is likely to be lawyering up pretty soon...notice, not a peep after all the sturm and drang of just a few weeks ago...

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply
    loading loading ...
    • 92%
      DarkWizard4 months, 2 weeks ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      FTA - "All told, more than 3,000 suspected terrorists have been arrested in many countries. And many others have met a different fate. Let's put it this way: They are no longer a problem to the United States and our friends and allies."

      Obviously, eliminating terrorist threats (or what we perceive as terrorism) to the U.S. and her allies should be considered a good thing. Unfortunately, the methodology of carrying out such operations, which circumvent proper channels and authorities, endangers our Democracy; our very foundation...The Constitution.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply
      loading loading ...
      • 10%
        rbiii4 months, 2 weeks ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        I'm still mocking his wacko ass.

        1) The program at the CIA was talked about in 2001. Hersh's BS story is about a military run operation.

        2) It never became operational.

        Nice try, though. Hersh hasn't come close to being right in years.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply

        11 Replies

        loading loading ...
      • 88%
        cowboygrandpa4 months, 2 weeks ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        FTA:

        "Dick Cheney ran a secret hit squad that he kept hidden from congressional oversight.

        "Congress has no oversight of it. It’s an executive assassination ring essentially, and it’s been going on and on and on," Hersh said at the time. He added: "Under President Bush’s authority, they’ve been going into countries, not talking to the ambassador or the CIA station chief, and finding people on a list and executing them and leaving. That’s been going on, in the name of all of us."

        “I said what I said, they can always say what they say,” Hersh told The Daily Beast. “The last time they said the government doesn’t torture, this time it’s the government doesn’t assassinate.”

        Some observers accused him of rumor-mongering and a top former military official threw cold water on the story, but with the recent news that the CIA allegedly kept Congress in the dark on a covert program, Hersh's words suddenly look more and more prescient. Yesterday, The New York Times reported the hidden program in question was a death squad authorized by Dick Cheney without congressional approval.

        Now, there are key differences between Hersh's reporting and the Times' latest piece. Hersh suggested that the assassination ring was conducted out of the Joint Special Operations Command rather than the CIA. Moreover, according to Hersh's sources, the program was operational, leaving a trail of bodies, while the Times cited officials saying that the CIA hit squad never actually carried out a mission. The Times and Hersh could conceivably be reporting two distinct squads."

        What a surprise. Hahahahahahaaaaa !!!! Cheney/Bush two idiots destined to be seen as bigger threats to America than the terrorists they conjured up to inflict their scam.

        Hard for citizens of other countries not hate and fear us when we have the incompetent duo still walking around free. While their murderous reign as the pretenders of moral and God fearing leaders of the free world crumbles all around them.

        False christians who are in league with the devil. Forgive them ?? Sure, but I want them to answer for what they did to the world and us. They need to be tried for treason and murder
        and shown as an example of what happens to false presidents and all their co-horts.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply

        1 Reply

        loading loading ...
      • 100%
        AnteUp4 months, 2 weeks ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        Rumsfeld had the same distain for the Democratic process
        as Cheney. Being accountable to the public was unthinkable
        and to Congress was out of the question. These guys resented
        the Watergate investigation and felt even more violated by
        the Iran/Contra investigations. That is why - from day one -
        there was a push,at all levels of their reign, to act as if
        the Unitary Executive was accepted. Only nine months into
        their first term it was imperative for the security of the
        nation for Bush to wield unlimited executive power.
        Rumsfeld had his own little special operations squads.
        As I recall he butted heads with the Pentagon about the
        Department of Defense usurping areas that had previously been under their jurisdiction.
        I shudder to think how these guys may have honed their CYA
        skills - starting all the way back to the Nixon administration!

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply
        loading loading ...
        • Neutral
          dBergeron4 months, 2 weeks ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          Yawn. . . Who cares?

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
          Reply

          3 Replies

          loading loading ...
        • 100%
          Charlson4 months, 2 weeks ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          What I really dislike of the VP is his cowardice. This past week, he's been hiding behind his daughter's skirt letting her plead his innocence (as if she is impartial).

          This man is a chicken hawk, never having served in a war himself but ready to send American soldiers into harm's way to enrich his corporate pals in Haliburton after receiving a $20 million severance before assuming the VP position in 2000.

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
          Reply

          3 Replies

          loading loading ...
        • 100%
          StevieGee4 months, 2 weeks ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          I'm not surprised. It's possible that Cheney would do these things. He's a bad man.

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
          Reply

          1 Reply

          loading loading ...
        • 100%
          AnteUp4 months, 2 weeks ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          A little excerpt from Sy Hersh's July 2008 New Yorker article,
          Preparing the Battlefield:
          The defensive-lethal language led some Democrats, according to congressional sources familiar with their views, to call in the director of the C.I.A., Air Force General Michael V. Hayden, for a special briefing. Hayden reassured the legislators that the language did nothing more than provide authority for Special Forces operatives on the ground in Iran to shoot their way out if they faced capture or harm.

          Just this week Hayden has resurfaced to proclaim that our
          Congress was FULLY BRIEFED. Oh! It really is laughable..
          ...just in case they need to shoot their way out?
          I guess we are way passed them hoping that we won't notice,
          they count on the public being disinterested or stupid.
          I suppose there is another choice, and that would be that
          they depend on a vast number of citizens to TRUST them.

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
          Reply
          loading loading ...
          View All 29 Comments

          Add a Comment

          Sign In With Your Propeller Account

          Forgot your password?

          Please keep your comments relevant to this story.

          To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.

          More News