BATF vs. States Rights
Montana and Tennessee: The Battle Begins »

Posted By populist 4 months, 4 weeks ago in Political Opinion

1 of 1

“The letter says, in part, ‘because the Act conflicts with Federal firearms laws and regulations, Federal law supersedes the Act, and all provisions of the Gun Control Act and the National Firearms Act, and their corresponding regulations, continue to apply.’ That is precisely what I predicted the Federal Government’s response to the Tennessee act would be. As I told Judge Andrew Napolitano on Fox News’s Glenn Beck Program on June 5, 2009, federal officials don’t care about a good historical argument concerning the meaning of the Constitution.”

Read Full Story at lewrockwell.com »

130 Views Share Story 0 Comments Report

Submitted By:
populist

The essays we offer are unapologetically presented for you to read & analyze. Many are offered as a similar view to ours & others simply to invite ...

Who Also Submitted: All »
Other Related Articles: All »

RSS Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 0 (view all)
- Display

Add a Comment

Sign In With Your Propeller Account

Forgot your password?

Please keep your comments relevant to this story.

To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.

Submit a Story

Advertisement

Story Tags ?

senate states federal bill tenth response amendment rights montana tennessee state firearms

Hey! If you Sign In, you can add tags to this story!

Dropping This Article

No one has dropped this story.

Groups Watching This

No groups are watching this story. Why not share it with your groups?

Also Submitted By

No one else has submitted this story.