« Back to story "Would the United States be Better Off as the Divided States?"

Story Comments

Posted by: CaptainLucid 4 months, 3 weeks ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

80%
CaptainLucid4 months, 3 weeks ago

This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

When I went through the TJ border I would always answer California when they asked my country. California could not only survive on its own we would likely have Oregon and Washington join us. Right now we subsidize the southern states. We would be so much better without the south.

(comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
Reply
1 Reply

loading ...
- 0%
  Codi69344 months, 3 weeks ago
  
  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
  
  You would get about a third of Washington. East of the Casade Mtns you would not have. West of the mountains ,you can have. How can you say you subsidize the south. California's bubget is blown, southern California depends on Neveda for its water. Northern California needs to cut off the parasites from south. You are right, the west coast would be better off without Southern California!!
  
  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
  Reply
  0 Replies
  
  loading ...