Brian Wright v Arkansas&Missouri Railroad Company »

Posted By FELALawyers 2 months, 2 weeks ago in News

1 of 1

Employee's appeal is denied because district court did not err in using evidence of his termination to attack his credibility. District Court's ruling that a locomotive under inspection is not covered under the Locomotive Inspection Act was affirmed.

Read Full Story at felaquestions.com »

1 View Share Story 0 Comments Report

Submitted By:
FELALawyers

At Gordon & Elias, L.L.P. we represent injured railroad workers throughout the nation. We are not "Union Designated" by any specific Union and we ...

Who Also Submitted:
Other Related Articles:

RSS Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 0 (view all)
- Display

Add a Comment

Sign In With Your Propeller Account

Forgot your password?

Please keep your comments relevant to this story.

To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.

More News

Submit a Story

Advertisement

Story Tags ?

locomotive wright employee arkansas railroad accident brian oil

Hey! If you Sign In, you can add tags to this story!

Also Propping This Article

view all »

Also Dropping This Article

No one has dropped this story.

Groups Watching This

No groups are watching this story. Why not share it with your groups?

Also Submitted By

No one else has submitted this story.