What Beck, Dobbs and Limbaugh Are Really Afraid Of »

Posted By ameliog 2 months, 2 weeks ago in Political Opinion

1 of 1

Can you smell the fear? Switch on cable news or tune in to talk radio and it comes wafting in.

Fox News Channel's Glenn Beck has bottled his own scent. Lou Dobbs' fear gives off a distinct undertone of racial intolerance. And Rush Limbaugh takes to the air to spread an odor that's designed to make Americans angry at, well, other Americans.

It's a fear that's laced with paranoia, stoked by misinformation and prejudice and fed to millions of people via powerful media. But most of all, it's a fear of the changes that an overwhelming majority of Americans called for when they stepped into voting booths last November.

Read Full Story at huffingtonpost.com »

316 Views Share Story 57 Comments Report

Submitted By:
ameliog

Where there is charity and wisdom, there is neither fear nor ignorance. (St. Francis of Assisi)

How many legs does a dog have if you ...

Who Also Submitted:
Other Related Articles:

RSS Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Showing 56 of 57 Comments (view all)
- Display
  • 61%
    Tumultuous2 months, 1 week ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    The restoral of the Fairness Doctrine would neutralize the right-wing bias currently in favor in the broadcasting industry.

    Regulating media content, including news reporting, is
    precisely what some members of Congress are now proposing as
    a way to "restore fairness in broadcasting" and counteract the
    "proliferation of highly partisan networks, news outlets, and
    ownership groups." The centerpiece of their campaign, featured in a House bill, is the resurrection of the Fairness Doctrine and the Federal Communications Commission policy.

    The Fairness Doctrine had two basic elements: It required broadcasters to devote some of their airtime to discussing controversial matters of public interest, and to air contrasting views regarding those matters. Stations were given wide latitude as to how to provide contrasting views: It could be done through news segments, public affairs shows or editorials.

    Formally adopted as an FCC rule in 1949 and repealed in 1987 by Ronald Reagan’s pro-broadcaster FCC, the doctrine can be traced back to the early days of broadcast regulation.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    12 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 50%
    miklkit2 months, 1 week ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    The Fairness Doctrine is possibly coming back? Woohoo!! I gotta write my representatives.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply
    loading loading ...
    • 53%
      simonsez2 months, 1 week ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      It would be a huge mistake to re-instate it with a ton of "unanticipated consequences".

      It won't do what you think you want it to do. It will do the opposite.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply

      13 Replies

      loading loading ...
    • 77%
      simonsez2 months, 1 week ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      I don't like Olberman so I don't watch him.

      I don't want him pushed off the air ...

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply
      loading loading ...
      • 38%
        FairNBalanced2 months, 1 week ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        They are afraid of SOCIALISM!

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply

        4 Replies

        loading loading ...
      • 64%
        NoWayMan2 months, 1 week ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        apparently they're afraid of everything.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply

        2 Replies

        loading loading ...
      • 80%
        Justice4All2 months, 1 week ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        I don't think these guys are afraid of anything. Any publicity, good or bad, brings attention.
        There will alyays be people who want to be told what they want to hear and who get angry at facts and logic. And there will always be special interests who support these guys.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply

        4 Replies

        loading loading ...
      • 43%
        Gary21122 months, 1 week ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        Wow, what the hell is this? I thought I was on AOL, you morons sound like the Daily Kos or some other moronic liberal hate site!

        Oh that's right, this article is linked to the Huffington Post, that paragon of virtue. NOT!

        You stupid liberals always want to shut down others free speech. You cannot compete in the marketplace of ideas, so you mustn't let the other side be heard.

        The reason why Rush Limbaugh has 20 million listeners, and is the king of radio is no secret. He is intelligent, and has ideas people agree with, and yes, is a joy to listen to.

        You turn on lib radio, and all you hear is idiots spewing incredible hate and vitriol. But ZERO ideas. No one wants to listen to that BS, not even other liberals!

        There ARE liberals that have a brain, not many, but a few. Put them on the radio and someone might listen.

        Camile Paglia, a REAL liberal, not a "progressive" dirt bag communist like we see out there now, has a huge readership. Conservatives read her ever week. LOTS of Conservatives.

        You know why? She has IDEAS!

        You losers can't compete, so you want government to FORCE people to only hear your message. Hitler, Stalin, Castro, and Chavez work this way.

        No party in American history so resembles the Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (National Socialist Germans Workers Party, NAZI for short) as does the modern democrat/communist party.

        Your president, like Hitler has even sent out his union thugs to attack people at town halls! ACORN and SEIU are the same people, founded by brothers, and ran out of the same offices.

        ACORN will be Obama's downfall though. He IS ACORN.

        Come up with some ideas people actually WANT to hear, and guess what, you'll get an audience!

        As long as liberalism is what it is, and insane fringe movement full on insane fringe ideas, no one will care.

        From the latest Rasmussen Report:

        "Progressive" is becoming more of a dirty word, but all political labels – except "being like Ronald Reagan" - are falling into disfavor with many U.S. voters, according to a new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey.

        "Liberal" is still the worst and remains the only political description that is viewed more negatively than positively. Being like Reagan is still the most positive thing you can say about a candidate.

        http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/pol...

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply

        3 Replies

        loading loading ...
      • 100%
        Natureboy2 months, 1 week ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        "What Beck, Dobbs and Limbaugh Are Really Afraid Of"

        I say it's being caught together in the world's most unsightly menage a trois.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply

        2 Replies

        loading loading ...
      View All 57 Comments

      Add a Comment

      Sign In With Your Propeller Account

      Forgot your password?

      Please keep your comments relevant to this story.

      To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.