Insurance Hypocrisy: Property more important than People »

Posted By ameliog 2 months ago in Political Opinion

1 of 1

It didn’t take very long for the conservative Republicans in the SouthEast, who have been yelling a lot lately about how Government is never the answer, to change their tune and beg for government assistance in the wake of widespread flooding. But I resisted posting a story about that, since I hate to hit people when they are down (even ignorant people).

But that was before I found a couple of stories about how the very same people who are opposing government health insurance, are for the exact same thing, but only if it applies to property and not to people’s health. So if your property floods, and you didn’t bother to purchase flood insurance, then they are all for the government bailing you out. But if you get sick and don’t have health insurance, you can die for all they care.

For example, when Hurricane Katrina hit the home of then Senator Trent Lott of Mississippi, and he hadn’t purchased flood insurance, he introduced a bill to provide retroactive insurance to flood victims such as himself. Retroactive benefits were also supported by Mississippi’s other Senator, Thad Cochran, and by governor Haley Barbour. But all three of these Republican have fought health care reform.

Read Full Story at politicalirony.com »

101 Views Share Story 3 Comments Report

Submitted By:
ameliog

Where there is charity and wisdom, there is neither fear nor ignorance. (St. Francis of Assisi)

How many legs does a dog have if you ...

Who Also Submitted:
Other Related Articles:

RSS Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 3 (view all)
- Display
  • 100%
    rightfromwrong2 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    the system loves property...the goal is too bankrupt the person so they have to sell it. there is always someone to take it as they have printed so many dollars and continue to do so almost indefinitely

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply
    loading loading ...
    • 100%
      fritz10212 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      Did you hit the nail on the head with this story.Thanxs for sharing .

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply
      loading loading ...
      • Neutral
        pollfl2 months ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        It seems to me that politicians are against whatever the other side is for and vice verse. Non of them do what is best for all of us, they are all interested in one thing, maintaing there power by getting re-elected and their bountiful benefits.
        Americans have to forget party affiliation and have to stand up for whomever promotes a sound program that reforms health care without bankrupty our unborn grandchildren or having us sacrifice our elderly to an pain killers to avoid the treatment they really need. The problem is were too busy to get involved, we need our own AARP for all of us in the middle.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply
        loading loading ...
        View All 3 Comments

        Add a Comment

        Sign In With Your Propeller Account

        Forgot your password?

        Please keep your comments relevant to this story.

        To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.