Social Security Likely To Go Into Red Next Year »

Posted By Tumultuous 2 months ago in Political News

Big job losses and a spike in early retirement claims from laid-off seniors will force Social Security to pay out more in benefits than it collects in taxes the next two years, the first time that's happened since the 1980s.

The deficits — $10 billion in 2010 and $9 billion in 2011 — won't affect payments to retirees because Social Security has accumulated surpluses from previous years totaling $2.5 trillion. But they will add to the overall federal deficit.

Read Full Story at npr.org »

383 Views Share Story 9 Comments Report

Submitted By:
Tumultuous

"Culture war has become the organizing principle of the Right" - Kevin Baker

Who Also Submitted:
Other Related Articles:

RSS Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 9 (view all)
- Display
  • 100%
    cowboygrandpa2 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    I know the feeling, I don't want to retire yet !!!

    I want to work until I can't work anymore, I like being productive and contributing to our society.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    1 Reply

    loading loading ...
  • 80%
    beavith12 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    all right! wahoo!!!

    lets get some universal health care and have that run into the red too!

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    2 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 100%
    corl642 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    Interesting article. these surpluses are what Clinton used to "balance" his budget. He actually borrowed money from SS in the form of issueing bonds for the surpluses of SS payments. The SS admin can not legally hold any over payments made. So, if these monies are transfered into bonds to be used by the rest of the government, how will they get the money back to pay it's short term liabilities? Interesting.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply
    loading loading ...
    • 0%
      bushiesRbonkers2 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      Fortunately, we have all those IOU's that Bush saw. Now we'll have to cash some in and retrieve the Social Security surplus from the moneyed class who received them in the Reagan-Bush programs of handouts for the rich. Admittedly, it will take some cajones for the Congress to turn on their owners.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply
      loading loading ...
      • 100%
        calitennflo2 months ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        Government needs know the physics associated with using money. Look at them manage! Or should I say they are destined to mismanage.
        mismanaged- To manage an area of responsibility in a way which is inept, incompetent, or dishonest
        en.wiktionary.org/wiki/mismanage

        Which is it? inept, incompetent, or dishonest? I choose they are ill!

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply
        loading loading ...
        • 100%
          ettucatk2 months ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          SS does have a trust fund, and while it will collect less than it takes in, as baby boomers retire, it will continue to be funded. Most likely, the short term response by "government" will probably be to up the retirement age, as they have been doing lately, in order to lessen the impact. Another plus for "government" will be the reduced care for seniors under the Obama DEATHCARE, having the outcome of ridding society of those who use the greatest portion of medical resources.

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
          Reply
          loading loading ...
          View All 9 Comments

          Add a Comment

          Sign In With Your Propeller Account

          Forgot your password?

          Please keep your comments relevant to this story.

          To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.