This story was previously titled "Controversial Facebook Bigwig Tied To ACORN Sting Videographer"

Controversial Facebook Bigwig Tied To ACORN Sting Videographer »

Posted By jovial 3 months ago in Political Opinion

1 of 1

Article: A new report reveals that the 'undercover pimp' videographer who secretly taped fictitious abuses taking place in ACORN offices may have tried to downplay funding received from controversial Facebook investor Peter Thiel and others shortly before he began his so-called 'independent' investigation.

Read Full Story at opednews.com »

277 Views Share Story 19 Comments Report

Submitted By:
jovial

Grew up In Brooklyn. Joined the Navy in 1976 stayed in 10 years. Aircraft Electronics tech. Worked for Major Govt. contractor then settled in California ...

Who Also Submitted: All »
Other Related Articles: All »

RSS Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 19 (view all)
- Display
  • 100%
    jovial3 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    FTA:
    "James O'Keefe, the man who dressed as a pimp to secretly videotape ACORN employees condoning illegal activities was found to have received funding from Peter Thiel, a politically controversial Conservative hedge fund baron - along with several other conservative donors. According to the Village Voice, Thiel admits paying O'Keefe approximately $10,000 for a video project despite the videographer's claims he is "absolutely independent", repeatedly stating he was not funded by outside parties."

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    1 Reply

    loading loading ...
  • 100%
    Progressive3 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    FTA:

    Perhaps the worst thing revealed in this report is the alleged lying by O'Keefe to cover his tracks after the fact. This shows his awareness of popular perception of the underhanded 'astroturf' movement, in which well-oiled conservative groups pay extra to create the illusion that the protests against Obama's policies are coming from average middle class citizens.

    Instead, we see these efforts are funded and aided by the wealthiest of the anti-populist upper class looking to suppress voter turn out in poor and working class American communities, continuing the work of the Bush Administration during the DOJ firing scandal and the vote-caging outrage in which lists of voters from heavily Democratic districts were discovered being sent from Karl Rove's RNC office server to a White House web server in order to intentionally bounce eligible voters from election rolls.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    1 Reply

    loading loading ...
  • 100%
    Tumultuous3 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    I recently read that James O'Keefe stated that he and his female associate supported themselves and financed the film for $1300. O'Keefe claimed they were forced to live on power bars and Subway sandwiches for a two month period.

    In reality, O'Keefe had his right-wing sugar daddy - Peter Thiel, supplying greenbacks for his con-man documentaries.

    From the moment this story broke, my intuition suggested this sting was funded by the conservative right-wing hate machine.

    Go figure.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    1 Reply

    loading loading ...
  • 100%
    hyperbola3 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    We should all be aware of what is really behind FaceBook. Pretty much the kind of corrupt right-wing oligarchs that we need to expose and destroy any credibility they ever had with well-deserved ridicule.

    "With Friends Like These… (the politics behind the people behind Facebook)"

    But Thiel is more than just a clever and avaricious capitalist. He is a futurist philosopher and neocon activist. A philosophy graduate from Stanford, in 1998 he co-wrote a book called The Diversity Myth, which is a detailed attack on liberalism and the multiculturalist ideology that dominated Stanford. He claimed that the "multiculture" led to a lessening of individual freedoms. While a student at Stanford, Thiel founded a rightwing journal, still up and running, called The Stanford Review - motto: Fiat Lux ("Let there be light"). Thiel is a member of TheVanguard.Org, an internet-based neoconservative pressure group that was set up to attack MoveOn.org, a liberal pressure group that works on the web. Thiel calls himself "way libertarian".

    ... This little taster from their website will give you an idea of their vision for the world: "TheVanguard.Org is an online community of Americans who believe in conservative values, the free market and limited government as the best means to bring hope and ever-increasing opportunity to everyone, especially the poorest among us." Their aim is to promote policies that will "reshape America and the globe". TheVanguard describes its politics as "Reaganite/Thatcherite". ...

    ... So, Thiel's politics are not in doubt. What about his philosophy? I listened to a podcast of an address Thiel gave about his ideas for the future. His philosophy, briefly, is this: since the 17th century, certain enlightened thinkers have been taking the world away from the old-fashioned nature-bound life, and here he quotes Thomas Hobbes' famous characterisation of life as "nasty, brutish and short", and towards a new virtual world where we have conquered nature. Value now exists in imaginary things...

    ...So by his own admission, Thiel is trying to destroy the real world, which he also calls "nature", and install a virtual world in its place, and it is in this context that we must view the rise of Facebook. Facebook is a deliberate experiment in global manipulation, and Thiel is a bright young thing in the neoconservative pantheon, with a penchant for far-out techno-utopian fantasies. Not someone I want to help get any richer.

    http://rockthetruth.blogspot.com/2008/01/behind-fa...

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    2 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 18%
    injest3 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    According to the Village Voice, Through a representative”

    Through a representative an unnamed unknown source?

    ROFLMAO! That’s weak.

    “Thiel admits paying O'Keefe approximately $10,000 for a video project”

    Through an unnamed unknown source?

    For A video project. Is ACORN “THE” “A” video project mentioned?

    Show me the proof!

    Do you have anything that will PROVE the ACORN employees, ALL 5 tapes so far, did NOT say what they were recorded saying.

    If you can’t do that you got nothing. You also are defending child sex slave trade.

    “As we learn O'Keefe was actually a young operative given extensive support”
    The Institute started O'Keefe off with a $500 "Balance in Media" grant in 2005”

    In 2005 would have been 19 years old, maybe just out of high school.
    Hanna would have been 14 or 15 years old at the time!

    Your conspiracy theory is both lame and weak.

    “In fact, one thing that I have noticed……..is that all of these conspiracy theories depend on the perpetrators being endlessly clever. I think you’ll find the facts also work if you assume everyone is endlessly stupid”

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    2 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 0%
    Klarissa3 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    see if Soros can match the funding!

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    3 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 0%
    BB643 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    So what's the big deal where his funding came from. He came to their area offering to open a business featuring child prostitutes and the well trained staff of Acorn offered their assistance and advise. That tells me Acorn is a major problem. It's clear, they were more than ready and able to recommend how to skirt our laws and they condoned the practice, unbelievable. For them to accept the idea of child prostitution and then recommend how to avoid getting caught, is unconscionable. Since this happened in more than one office, it's clear dishonesty and corruption are the norm for Acorn and all funding should end now. Tax exempt status too should be pulled. It's time the get the Treasury involved and do a full audit of every book, paper, letter and whatever else they do should be carefully reviewed. If they condone or in the 3 cases, support child prostitution, it's clear there isn't a crime low enough they won't support. The RICO Act clearly needs to be considered.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    2 Replies

    loading loading ...
View All 19 Comments

Add a Comment

Sign In With Your Propeller Account

Forgot your password?

Please keep your comments relevant to this story.

To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.