Rachel Maddow Won’t Toe The Media Line On ACORN »

Posted By mesodude 2 months ago in Political News

ACORN is not popular these days. But Rachel Maddow doesn't give a damn, because she thinks ACORN got screwed — by the self-reinforcing Conservative echo chamber, and by a credulous, lazy media.

Last night she had on Professor Peter Dreier, a politics professor at Occidental College to discuss his recent report: “Manipulating the Public Agenda: Why ACORN Was in the News, and What the News Got Wrong” which details how “opinion entrepreneurs” planted the seeds of the story, which were picked up by the echo chamber, blown up by McCain-Palin and then Glenn Beck, et voilà.

Read Full Story at mediaite.com »

555 Views Share Story 36 Comments Report

Submitted By:
mesodude

Who Also Submitted:
Other Related Articles:

RSS Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 36 (view all)
- Display
  • 64%
    jordan112 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    This is why I watch Maddow.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    4 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 75%
    miklkit2 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    Investigative journalism is very rare these days. It seems no one is interested in the facts anymore. Just hot air.

    Go Rachel!

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    1 Reply

    loading loading ...
  • 69%
    Charlson2 months ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    This is another case where the right-leaning MSM has failed in their jobs as reporters and investigators and never researched the claims against ACORN but gave only the detractors side of this non-story.

    The real story is the private contractors who are allowed to defraud the government and when caught continued to reap large government contracts. No defunding when the costs are in the billions but go after a community grassroots organization that helps the poor and disadvantaged that are funded for puny percentage of what private contractors steal from our country.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply
    loading loading ...
    • 75%
      Sageparadox2 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      Wow, what a informative clip. I didnt know any of that. I just assumed that Acorn was just another one of those shady organizations. Guees I have a different view of them now.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply

      1 Reply

      loading loading ...
    • 25%
      ernieford2 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      I thought Rachael only had talons.....watched her once....NEVER AGAIN

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply

      1 Reply

      loading loading ...
    • 31%
      alanocu2 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      ACORN is now such a pariah that the IRS refuses to associate with them for fear of becoming less popular, and the IRS recently lost a popularity contest to an untreatable, pus-crusted, blistery, genital rash.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply

      1 Reply

      loading loading ...
    • 45%
      jonnyrttn2 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      Only a lib could defend acorns voter fraud and these videos.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply

      1 Reply

      loading loading ...
    • 29%
      injest2 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      “Manipulating the Public Agenda: Why ACORN Was in the News, and What the News Got Wrong” which details how “opinion entrepreneurs”

      Ya mean like MSNBC, AirAmerica, and others?

      "planted the seeds of the story, which were picked up by the echo chamber, blown up by McCain-Palin"

      Okay where’s the McCain-Palin statement on the ACORN scandal?
      Where is their JOINT statement?

      There isn’t one. Maddow is a liar.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply

      2 Replies

      loading loading ...
    • 29%
      injest2 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      · "82.8% of the stories about ACORN’s alleged involvement in voter fraud failed to mention that actual voter fraud is very rare (only 17.2% did mention it)"

      Who ever wrote this is an idiot.

      Voter fraud, AKA Electoral fraud, includes "illegal voter registration", "intimidation at polls" and "improper vote counting".

      The rest of this “report” is a bizarre conspiracy theory at best, and has nothing to do with why ACORN is in a world of dung today.

      It is the 5 tapes (so far more to come) from the East cost to the West cost, all dealing with child prostitution and the international child sex slave trade and TAX EVASION that has ACORN in the wringer.

      One is a “Bad Apple”.
      Two is a “Coincidence”.
      Three is a “Errr What?”.
      Four is a “WTF O”.
      Five is an “Undeniable Pattern of Criminal Activity.”

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply

      1 Reply

      loading loading ...
    • 29%
      injest2 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      jordan11

      I didnt know any of that.>>>>

      That's why I watch her. She digs for facts, and she backs them up

      Really?

      “The media also failed to distinguish allegations of voter registration problems from allegations of actual voting irregularities.”

      There is NO difference! Voter registration fraud IS voter fraud!
      Considering no ID is required at the polls, there is NO way to verify if the person voting is a legal vote or not.

      Maddow is banking on you being to stupid to understand the difference or to lazy to look it up!

      Question, Is she correct?

      “The “voter fraud” frame appeared in 55% of the 647 news stories about the community organization in 15 mainstream news organizations during 2007 and 2008.
      The news media stories about ACORN were overwhelmingly negative, reporting allegations by Republicans and conservatives.”

      Naw really? Stories about ACORN and their “voter fraud” are negative? Who woulda thought it?

      What exactly would a positive story about ACORN and their “voter fraud” look like?

      To date some 30 ACORN officials have been convicted of fraud, not including the conviction today in Nevada or the 11 ACORN officials currently under investigation in Florida.

      Is it any wonder ACORN is viewed negatively by most normal people?

      Gotta love the Al Capone “Soup kitchen” defense of ACORN

      “Although ACORN is involved in many community activities around the country, including efforts to improve housing, wages, access to credit, and public education”

      Any proof of that? Why won’t ACORN open their books and prove their case? Where did she back that up?

      Speaking of proof, Maddow said,

      “including the firing of U.S. Attorneys who refused to cooperate with the politicization of voter fraud accusations – firings that ultimately led to the resignation of U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales”

      Please state the case and FACTUAL evidence that PROVES “the firing of U.S. Attorneys who refused to cooperate with the politicization of voter fraud accusations” was the reason they were replaced.

      Hint there isn’t any. Once again Maddow lies.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply

      2 Replies

      loading loading ...
    • 29%
      injest2 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      Miklkit
      "Investigative journalism is very rare these days. It seems no one is interested in the facts anymore. Just hot air"

      Go Rachel!

      And what “FACTS” did she provide that somehow prove that the ACORN employees in the videos did not say what they said?

      ROFLMAO!

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply

      1 Reply

      loading loading ...
    • 0%
      gormannarbor-192 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      Maddow is information-proof. She is completely capable of making up her mind in a factual vacuum.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply

      1 Reply

      loading loading ...
    • 20%
      aearthling592 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      Maddow and Obama have had great educations, but they are book learned only. She's had no experience in the federal government, military, business, etc. which makes her world view, limited.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply

      1 Reply

      loading loading ...
    • 67%
      jblack452 months ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      to endscopy if you want to see shoddy journalism you should stick to the Fox misinterpetthenews network. They don't fact check anything. It's like the camera's start rolling and they start lying. Sure ACORN has a few loose screws that give the company a bad name and they have been and should have been dealt with. Every organization have some people in it that really give it a bad name even your Republican Party(Eric Cantor, Charles Grassley; Michelle Bachmann, Almost any of your South Carolina Congress people). But the point Ms Maddow was trying to make is that there are some positive things this organization has done too which Fox news And all the rest of those holier-than-thou conservatives fail to talk about. And she also points out that there are other organization like Black Water who are doing far worse things than ACORN and you never here it from Fox news or the conservatives.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply
      loading loading ...
      • 100%
        Leftist1 month, 4 weeks ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        Why are we so concerned about ACORN? Is it because they want to represent the little guy in an Amerika that has been raped and abused by the racist, exploitative, greedy corporate culture that has ruined this country? ACORN voter registration efforts helped get out the vote of people that have been disenfranchised by the capitalist system. ACORN shouldn't be investigated, they should be getting the support of the government instead of supporting corporations and fat cats interested only in getting rich and keeping the poor in the underclass.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply
        loading loading ...
        • 0%
          jansimply1 month, 4 weeks ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          You have to be a pathetic piece of garbage to watch Rachal Maddows or Keith Olbermann. They support parasites so, if you watch them, you must have a lot in common. They are an embarrassment in this country. That is why their ratings are in the gutter waiting to be thrown in the incinerator. If you watch them, you are among the few.

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
          Reply
          loading loading ...
          View All 36 Comments

          Add a Comment

          Sign In With Your Propeller Account

          Forgot your password?

          Please keep your comments relevant to this story.

          To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.