Vitter Slapped With Prostitution Complaint »

Posted By Progressive 1 month, 3 weeks ago in Political News

Watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility (CREW) has filed a bar complaint with the Louisiana Office of Disciplinary Counsel against Sen. David Vitter (R-La.), charging that the Senator violated state rules of professional conduct for lawyers by soliciting prostitution.

Read Full Story at huffingtonpost.com »

477 Views Share Story 96 Comments Report

Submitted By:
Progressive

There are only two kinds of people who are really fascinating: people who know absolutely everything, and people who know absolutely nothing. -- Oscar Wilde

I ...

Who Also Submitted:
Other Related Articles:

RSS Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 96 (view all)
- Display
  • 87%
    miklkit1 month, 3 weeks ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    Go for it! People who live in glass houses...........

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply
    loading loading ...
    • 88%
      fiftynine1 month, 3 weeks ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      Yes,let the hypocrisy begin..again.
      I mean shouldn't he be impeached or did Acorn set him up ? What excuse will they have this time?

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply

      17 Replies

      loading loading ...
    • 77%
      Charlson1 month, 3 weeks ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      Be careful where the acorns fall, Vitters, especially when you cast the first stone.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply

      12 Replies

      loading loading ...
    • 27%
      beavith11 month, 3 weeks ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      LOL!

      could this be tit for tat?

      for that matter, shouldn't Max Baucus be up on that same charge?

      should most lawyers?

      this is such a senseless article replete with gloating.

      you're right miklkit. glass houses....

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply

      25 Replies

      loading loading ...
    • 20%
      BB641 month, 3 weeks ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      While I find Vitter's act repulsive since he hasn't been charged with anything, this is little more than a typical witch hunt. If you're going to go after his license, then you'll also want to make sure you're prepared to go after Acorn also.

      Again, I am offended and question his values, but what he did or is alleged to have done is no where near the level that Acorn did. Add to that, Acorn staff were taped recommending how to not only bring in illegal aliens into this country but they were to be children and they were to work in the sex trade. So we have an attorney who may have called on an prostitute or we have an entire organization heavily subsidized by the taxpayers, recommending how to set up a child prostitution ring in at least 3 major cities. I'm sorry, this attempted smoke screen doesn't get close.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply

      18 Replies

      loading loading ...
    • 88%
      jovial1 month, 3 weeks ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      Here we go again. These Republicans can't keep it in their pants. Yet they hooted and hollered relentlessly when Clinton got a BJ.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply

      10 Replies

      loading loading ...
    • 100%
      cowboygrandpa1 month, 3 weeks ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      FTA:

      "In 2007, Vitter's telephone number was found in the client list of the "D.C. Madam," or Deborah Jeane Palfrey, operator of a high-profile prostitution ring. At the time, the senator confirmed in a statement that he did in fact seek Palfrey's services: "This was a very serious sin in my past for which I am, of course, completely responsible."

      D.C. and Louisiana Law maintain that the solicitation of prostitution is a crime. Under Louisiana Rules of Professional Conduct, it is professional misconduct for a lawyer to "commit a criminal act especially one that reflects adversely on the lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other aspects." CREW argues that the solicitation of prostitution is a crime, and by engaging in such criminal activity repeatedly, Vitter violated law and should be investigated and disciplined.

      The complaint filed against Vitter emerged as a response to his push for an investigation into the community organization ACORN. Melanie Sloan, CREW's executive director said:

      Sen. Vitter's zeal to see ACORN criminally investigated for offering advice in setting up a prostitution ring reminded me he has yet to be held accountable for his own role in a prostitution ring... "While ACORN's conduct is indefensible, so is Sen. Vitter's and what is good for the goose is good for the gander."

      So lets see !!! He is a lawyer and a Senator so that makes him above the law ????

      Hmmmmmmm !!!!! I don't think so !!!!

      Physician heal thyself !!!! Remove the log from your eye before trying to remove the splinter from another's !!!!!

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply

      2 Replies

      loading loading ...
    • 29%
      lloydm651 month, 3 weeks ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      Vitter,you dummy why didn't you just switch parties,not only could you fool around with one you could have rented five,or six of them out.Plus with the right connections in the house you you would be protected,and tax exempt.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply

      4 Replies

      loading loading ...
    View All 96 Comments

    Add a Comment

    Sign In With Your Propeller Account

    Forgot your password?

    Please keep your comments relevant to this story.

    To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.