Judge Confirms Obama Eligibility Trial to Proceed »
Posted By BronxBomber 1 month, 2 weeks ago in Political News
I just received a call from Orly Taitz, my attorney in the case seeking proof of Obama's eligibility for the Office of President of the United States. Judge Carter has released a statement declaring that the dates he set for the hearing and trial on the eligibility issue are confirmed, and it will move forward as scheduled. Apparently he was not swayed by the Obama lawyer's arguments.
Read Full Story at aipnews.com »
355 Views Share Story 17 Comments Report
Submitted By:
BronxBomber
Hello!
Welcome to my profile!
(Pardon the ambiance, but it's the maid's day off)
(Please also check my ‘submissions’ and prop vote them ...
Who Also Submitted:
RSS Join the Discussion
+ Add CommentComments So Far: 17 (view all)
-
-
-
100%
EKB_1 month, 2 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Reply
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
CV-90 (12/02) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Page 1 of 1
Case No. SACV09-0082 DOC (ANx) Date October 5, 2009
Title CAPTAIN PAMELA BARNETT, ET AL. V. BARACK HUSSEIN
OBAMA, ET AL. Present: The
Honorable
David O. Carter, U.S. District Judge
Kristee Hopkins Debbie Gale N/A
Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants:
Orly Taitz
Gary Kreep
David DeJute, AUSA
Roger West, AUSA
Proceedings: 1. MOTION BY DEFENDANTS TO DISMISS CASE 2. SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
Cause called and counsel state their appearances. Argument by counsel. Motion taken under submission.
On September 8, 2009, the Court previously set tentative case management dates. The Court now orders those dates be made final. Case Management dates are as follows:
Motion for Summary Judgment Hearing December 7, 2009, at 8:30 a.m.
File Motion for Summary Judgment November 16, 2009
Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment November 26, 2009
Reply to Motion for Summary Judgment November 30, 2009
Final Pretrial Conference January 11, 2010, at 8:30 a.m.
Jury Trial January 26, 2010, at 8:30 a.m.
3 : 21 01 Initials of Preparer kh
Case 8:09-cv-00082-DOC-AN Document 81 Filed 10/05/2009 Page 1 of 1 -
hefaa1Comment removed: Hard Banned
-
hefaa1Comment removed: Hard Banned
-
100%
cowboygrandpa1 month, 2 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Are you sure of this link?
Reply
This is what my computer said to me when I clicked it:
Reported Attack Site!
This web site at www.orlytaitzesq.com has been reported as an attack site and has been blocked based on your security preferences.
Attack sites try to install programs that steal private information, use your computer to attack others, or damage your system.
Some attack sites intentionally distribute harmful software, but many are compromised without the knowledge or permission of their owners.
Could you embed video or just copy and paste some of the text? I'm leary of this warning, which I have never seen before.
Edited by Roundhead 2009-10-07 1:01 PM
Posted 2009-10-07 12:59 PM (#25029 - in reply to #25026) By: Roundhead -
100%
cowboygrandpa1 month, 2 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I found this under the comments
Reply
"Are you sure of this link?
This is what my computer said to me when I clicked it:
Reported Attack Site!
This web site at www.orlytaitzesq.com has been reported as an attack site and has been blocked based on your security preferences.
Attack sites try to install programs that steal private information, use your computer to attack others, or damage your system.
Some attack sites intentionally distribute harmful software, but many are compromised without the knowledge or permission of their owners.
Could you embed video or just copy and paste some of the text? I'm leary of this warning, which I have never seen before.
Edited by Roundhead 2009-10-07 1:01 PM
Posted 2009-10-07 12:59 PM (#25029 - in reply to #25026) By: Roundhead" -
-
-
100%
Dionys1 month, 2 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
"I find it interesting that there apparently is enough evidence to require court dates."
Reply
Obviously you've never read anything about courts or law. Requiring court dates says nothing about the evidence. Nor does going ahead with a trial. All it says is that someone has standing to bring suit. Which again says nothing about evidence.
-
-
Neutral
harpro2071 month, 2 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
Were passports required for children in the 1960's? When I was a baby, I'm pretty sure I traveled on my Mom's passport when we went to Germany where my Dad was in the Army. I never saw a passport in my name when I was young and when I went to get one at age 17, if I remember right, the one I received wasn't a renewal but a new issue.
Reply-
Neutral
Justice4All1 month, 2 weeks ago
This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »
I think you're right. Children today get 5 year passports of their own, but I think that's only been th last 10 years or so. They used to travel on their parents passport.
Reply
I have my grandads passport from the 1950's. It included his wife and children.
-
More News
Politics Daily
Sarah Palin's Visit with Billy Graham: Dinner, Prayer and a Photo-Op
Obama Met State Dinner Party Crashers; Secret Service Taking Blame
Will Sarah Palin Ever Be President? A Guide to the Predictions
White House Gate-Crashers: Security Breach or Social Office Lapse?
A Year Out, Wisconsin Governor's Race Shaping Up to Be Close
The Huffington Post
Andy Borowitz: White House Party Crashers Almost Started Nuclear War
Jane Smiley: Stop The Injustice: Free Gary McKinnon
Tara Stiles: Your Holiday Relaxation Rescue Guide (VIDEO)
Huff Radio: Left, Right & Center: Is America Ungovernable? Plus: Men, Women and History
Candy Spelling: Time's 'Decade From Hell' Vs. 'The Best Is Yet To Come"
Submit a Story
Advertisement
Add a Comment
Sign In With Your Propeller Account
Please keep your comments relevant to this story.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.