AP finally reports on insurance industry’s thin margins »

Posted By pc25 1 month ago in Political News

While Democrats in Congress have spent months demonizing insurers as greedy villainous monsters, from Barack Obama to Nancy Pelosi to Alan Grayson, the American media stood mute rather than report on the extent of this supposed greed. Why? It’s not as if these companies don’t have annual reports, or that business media haven’t tracked their performance.

Read Full Story at hotair.com »

135 Views Share Story 26 Comments Report

Submitted By:
pc25

studio engineer, studio musician, producer

Who Also Submitted:
Other Related Articles:

RSS Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 26 (view all)
- Display
  • 69%
    pc251 month ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    FTA

    The average profit margin for health insurers last year clocked in at an anemic 2.2%. What does that mean from the investor position? They would have done better to put their money into FDIC-insured savings accounts at their local bank, let alone a CD or other guaranteed investment device. A 2.2% profit margin would normally trigger a stockholder revolt.

    >

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    2 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 45%
    mesodude1 month ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    What cons don't seem to realize is that the maximum amount of profit anyone one should be able make by rationing health care is ZERO. It's always been zero. It's zero today and it will be zero tomorrow. This notion that the game changes simply because health insurance companies don't make as much percentage-wise as other industries do is ludicrous because we're talking about FOR PROFIT insurance--which should not exist AT ALL.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply

    4 Replies

    loading loading ...
  • 100%
    rimbaud1 month ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    The health insurance companies are in a constant fight to be able to pay out the claims submitted to them. Without reform, they will be unable to insure their healthy members and still pay the claims of their sick ones. Even with insurance, serious illness can send some of their members into the poor house. Follow the money...

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply
    loading loading ...
    • 67%
      willottica1 month ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      The problem with insurance companies isn't, and has never been, outrageous profit margins. It's outrageous overhead costs. Exectutive salaries and bonuses, middle management salaries and bonuses, claim denier salaries and bonuses: none of these are included in the profits, yet they all take money away from Health Care. The Insurance industry is a giant leach on the productivity of the nation. They produce nothing, yet take a substantial sum of money away from those who are ill (or might become ill).

      The profit motive of the industry is only a small problem in comparison, because it enshrines into corporate policy that denying someone's health care claims is better for the company than providing the service they are contracted to do (which is to create and maintain a risk-sharing pool of resources so that no-one is crippled by a disastrously high health care bill).

      The profit motive is bad, because it allows for bonuses to be paid based on increased "profit". Though a risk sharing pool that collects more than it pays out has failed to perform as efficiently as it should. "Profits" by the Health Insurance industry actually result from a failure to properly predict the average cost of health care. So bonuses are paid when people are either overcharged or underserved by their insurance.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply

      4 Replies

      loading loading ...
    • 67%
      dizzo491981 month ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      IF INSURANCE COMPANIES WANT MORE PROFIT AND WE WANT CHEAPER INS.
      WHY DON'T THEY SUPPORT TORT REFORM 800 BILLION IS NOT SMALL CHANGE
      WE SHOULD HAVE OVERSTATE LINE BUYING,TO CREATE COMPATITION

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply

      1 Reply

      loading loading ...
    • 100%
      lloydm651 month ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      Absolutely we should have tort reform,and freedom to purchase our health care from any where is the U S.I have been against employers buying insurance for their employees for fifty years, it just doesn't work.I'm willing to bet if we had an employer grocery card people would put things in their shopping carts that they wouldn't dare buy today.I believe a hundred million employees could,and would compete for policies that fit their needs at a better price.No bells,or whistles,no first dollar claims,just good coverage.I also believe we should tell our law makers that all premiums be paid from pre tax income.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply

      1 Reply

      loading loading ...
    • 100%
      doppich1 month ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      How much they skim off the top is perhaps interesting, but what is the ROI, which a better measure of stockholders' return?

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply
      loading loading ...
      • 100%
        fjgalt1 month ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        Charlie Sheen wants $2 million per episode of "Two and a half men." Is that excessive? Should his "salary" be reduced to the $200,000 limit on business executives? Should he be paid any more than the average workingman? If not, why shouldn't his and every actor's wealth be redistributed among the rest of us?

        Why should Rearden be the only one to profit from Rearden metal?

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply

        1 Reply

        loading loading ...
      View All 26 Comments

      Add a Comment

      Sign In With Your Propeller Account

      Forgot your password?

      Please keep your comments relevant to this story.

      To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.