« Back to story "Dumb-O-Crat: Pew Shows Republicans Are Consistently More Knowledgeable"

Story Comments

Posted by: david_nwpa 1 month, 3 weeks ago

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

All Comments Share Story Report

  • 56%
    david_nwpa1 month, 3 weeks ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    So a survey run by a conservative polling firm, asking only 12 questions to about 1,000 people in a nation of over 120 million voters is supposed to be an accurate reflection of the voting populace? Sorry, but the "randomness" of the sampling and the bias of the questioner leaves me to scrap the entire poll and this entire article. Try again RTHT.

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
    Reply

    8 Replies

    loading loading ...
    • 53%
      mesodude1 month, 3 weeks ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      Con desperation knows no bounds. They love doing this...They'll track down the one (or two, at most) right leaning source that differs with the finding of the vast majority of sources and then trumpet this as if THIS is, in fact, the *definitive* study, or poll, or survey, etc. ;-P

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
      Reply

      3 Replies

      loading loading ...
      • 43%
        lovemylibs1 month, 3 weeks ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        Said the guy who can't even figure how to delete messages from his Propeller message center. ;-}

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
        Reply

        2 Replies

        loading loading ...
        • 100%
          mesodude1 month, 3 weeks ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          LOL...Thanks for proving my point, lovey. You cons with your arbitrary IQ measurement criteria and situational ethics and morality are an absolute scream. ;-P

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
          Reply
          loading loading ...
          • Neutral
            david_nwpa1 month, 2 weeks ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            Yes, yes, because I have so much time in my day to go back and even bother removing messages from a part of my site I hardly ever read. Lovemylibs, attack the article, not the messenger.

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 5) (recursion depth : 4) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
            Reply
            loading loading ...
        • 50%
          Endoscopy1 month, 3 weeks ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          On the tonight show many years ago if I remember correctly they asked people working in 7-11 type stores simple questions. They were using them to figure out who was going to win a football game. Most of the people had no clue about what the answers were. Ignorance abounded. Questions like who is the president etc.

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
          Reply
          loading loading ...
          • 50%
            beavith11 month, 3 weeks ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            welcome to the wonderful world of statistics.

            find a poll you don't like and throw it out as wrong?

            is that the same thing as sticking your fingers in your ears and shouting LALALALALA?

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 3) (recursion depth : 2) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
            Reply

            2 Replies

            loading loading ...
            • 100%
              fsev411 month, 3 weeks ago

              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

              Is not the reverse true also, find a poll you like and claim it's gospel?

              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
              Reply
              loading loading ...
              • 100%
                mesodude1 month, 3 weeks ago

                This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                "find a poll you don't like and throw it out as wrong?"

                --You cons don't even see when you're being the biggest hypocrites on the planet. You don't like that the VAST MAJORITY of scientists believe we're choking the life out of our planet so you gravitate toward the findings of "scientists" (wh*res, let's be honest) paid by the corporations and the energy lobbies. You don't like that most Americans know our health care system is FUBAR so you pay send MORE wh*res to town hall meetings to act like embaciles and then pretend that manufacture right wing hysteria and histrionics= the majority viewpoint. Time and time again, delusional twenty percenter cons go around blathering that "America" wants this or "America" wants that. Cons? Once again, *you* are not the world. Get over yourselves and get a grip. ;-P

                (comment_max_expanded_depth : 55) (comment depth : 4) (recursion depth : 3) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 55)
                Reply
                loading loading ...

            Post Reply

            You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in to post a reply.

            People Who Liked This Comment (10)

            People Who Didn't Like This Comment (8)