Congress Funds Study on How To Avoid Constituents »

Posted By gunnyreef 1 month ago in News

1 of 1

This Friday, the tax payer funded Congressional Management Foundation is hosting a briefing for Members of Congress and their staff on their new study: Online Town Hall Meetings: Exploring Democracy in the 21st Century . The CMF study consisted of 21 townhall meetings where Members of Congress and CMF provided a moderator: spoke via voice over IP, and constituents asked questions and made comments by typing them. Only off-topic, redundant, unintelligible, or offensive questions were screened, and only questions asked by people who had not yet asked a question were prioritized.

Read Full Story at blog.heritage.org »

988 Views Share Story 16 Comments Report

Submitted By:
gunnyreef

I am a true conservative, i believe in limited government, low taxes, personal responsibility,states rights and personal freedom! I tow no party lines and ...

Who Also Submitted: All »
Other Related Articles: All »

RSS Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 16 (view all)
- Display
  • 90%
    calitennflo1 month ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    representaion? LOL

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply
    loading loading ...
    • 85%
      gunnyreef1 month ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      Now there is some change you can believe in for sure!

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply
      loading loading ...
      • 91%
        Xaos1 month ago

        This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

        This does not surprise me at all.

        (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
        Reply
        loading loading ...
        • 82%
          icono11 month ago

          This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

          Hope, change, and transparency all in one neat package.

          (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
          Reply
          loading loading ...
          • 100%
            normallysilent1 month ago

            This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

            Hope they do stay in their offices because I plan on being there to meet them. Be seeing ya Thursday

            (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
            Reply
            loading loading ...
            • 100%
              tadair9191 month ago

              This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

              They can't avoid you. You have a right to make an appointment with them and talk to them in person. Even if you just end up speaking to their staffers -- they're the ones who usually end up making all the decisions, anyway.

              (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
              Reply
              loading loading ...
              • 69%
                Endoscopy1 month ago

                This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                Typical of Democrats. Trying to hide from the tea party people at town meetings.

                (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
                Reply
                loading loading ...
                • 80%
                  Tangent0011 month ago

                  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                  Sounds like a good thing. Technology is a tool like anything. Colorado has scads of mountain communities. I'm sure those people would like the chance to engage their Senators without hauling their Butts down to Denver.

                  Of course the Tea Party folks will see this as a way to thwart their disruptive tactics. So be it. They threw civility in the gutter, let them lay in that bed. Also, from the article, there is no indication this is a Democrat initiative.

                  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
                  Reply

                  2 Replies

                  loading loading ...
                • 44%
                  Tasine1 month ago

                  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                  FTA:
                  The online town halls increased constituents’ approval of the Member. Every Member involved experienced an increase in approval by the constituents who participated. The average net approval rating (approve minus disapprove) jumped from +29 before the session to +47 after. There were also similar increases in trust and perceptions of personal qualities – such as whether they were compassionate, hardworking, accessible, etc. – of the Member.
                  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                  This tells me there were no upset constituents there. What was there was hand-picked gullible suckers. Or perhaps, merely ACORN members.

                  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
                  Reply

                  1 Reply

                  loading loading ...
                • 60%
                  Tumultuous1 month ago

                  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                  I see that this thread has been twirled with typical partisan spin. Some of the commenter's have further manipulated the misleading facts stated in the article to support their personal perspectives. This disingenuous bias voids the relevance of their opinions.

                  If the reader follows the links in the article, they will be taken to the actual report referenced in the article.

                  No where does the article state that this study was strictly a Democrat initiative, nor was it.

                  Here is the direct link to the study:

                  http://nposoapbox.s3.amazonaws.com/cmfweb/Online-T...

                  The report states "To enable Members of Congress to balance
                  constituent input and their own policy judgments and to effectively communicate and gain support for their policy decisions, they must use what we call a Madisonian or “Republican” feedback model".

                  "Twelve U.S. Representatives and one U.S. Senator participated in the sessions. Eight "Representatives conducted two sessions each, and four Representatives and the Senator conducted one session each. The participating Members were representative of the body. For example, for the experiment with the Representatives, there were 7 Democrats and 5 Republicans, with a member of leadership from each party; there was excellent geographic balance, and a balance of views".

                  The study is neutral, bipartisan and presents no bias. blog.heritage.org puts an irresponsible and misleading spin on the study by titling this article "Congress Funds Study on How To Avoid Constituents".

                  America is under assault by morally bankrupt Republican ethics, such as those exemplified in this article.

                  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
                  Reply

                  2 Replies

                  loading loading ...
                • 100%
                  bill3451 month ago

                  This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

                  who decides what is: off-topic, redundant, unintelligible, or offensive questions...

                  have you been on youtube, seen the videos where democrates run rough shot and break congressional rules...

                  but hey, it's only our tax dollars - hope the study went the DNC's way....

                  (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
                  Reply
                  loading loading ...
                  View All 16 Comments

                  Add a Comment

                  Sign In With Your Propeller Account

                  Forgot your password?

                  Please keep your comments relevant to this story.

                  To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.

                  More News