High Costs Weigh on Troop Debate for Afghan War »

Posted By engineer 2 weeks, 5 days ago in Political News

1 of 1

While President Obama’ s decision about sending more troops to Afghanistan is primarily a military one, it also has substantial budget implications that are adding pressure to limit the commitment, senior administration officials say.

Read Full Story at www10.nytimes.com »

59 Views Share Story 2 Comments Report

Submitted By:
engineer

Hi

My background is Biomedical engineering with an MBA As you know from all my comments where I almost stand politically. I have loads of ...

Who Also Submitted: All »
Other Related Articles: All »

RSS Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 2 (view all)
- Display
  • 100%
    FairNBalanced2 weeks, 1 day ago

    This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

    Obama gets back today from a trip to East Asia that accomplished, N.O.T.H.I.N.G. !!

    (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
    Reply
    loading loading ...
    • Neutral
      Wolfie20072 weeks, 1 day ago

      This comment is below the standard viewing threshold View It »

      Exactly as I said a couple of days ago, Obama doesn't want to spend the money to win in Afghanistan. Obama would prefer not to have to send any money on the military.

      (comment_max_expanded_depth : 2) (comment depth : 2) (recursion depth : 1) (max_comment_reply_depth : 40) (comment_max_render_depth : 3)
      Reply
      loading loading ...
      View All 2 Comments

      Add a Comment

      Sign In With Your Propeller Account

      Forgot your password?

      Please keep your comments relevant to this story.

      To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.